![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 21, 2010. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Part of the article about languages should be verified. From what I know they renamed it to 'mothertongue language' then back to serbian then I am not sure. I am adding the tag for verification. Avala 16:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"On May 21, the people of Montenegro voted 56% in favour of independence. This is more than the 55% required for the vote to be ratified.".
As it's currently 0300 (BST) on the morning of the 21st, this seems a little premature. I have been bold and removed it. Alasdairrussell 0300, 21 May 2006
It would seem somebody had the same thought as I did, at the same time, and did it while I was adding this comment on the talk page. Either way, I'll leave it as a record of the change.Alasdairrussell
Why will the Serbian government need to be "reconstructed" if Montenegro votes to break away? The Serbian govt. is totally separate from the govt. of Serbia and Montengro, correct? --Jfruh 03:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not officialy,although many of Serbian state officals are Montenegrians(amongst other Serbian President Boris Tadic).Milosevic was also montenegrian.They all have Serbian citizenship though,so thats not a problem.
Serbian Goverment should resign because they kept promising to us that Serbia and Montenegro will be togather,and IF(although it seems like referendum failed,will know in 10 am) but IF referendum won,then Serbian goverment should resign and apologise for lying to us Dzoni
Cabrilo,please dont lie to these foreigns that just want to know whats happening.Military is not devided,neiter de facto or de jure ,because its in Federal autority with one Minister of it(Zoran Stankovic) and one commanding General and also all basis all in the federal jurisdiction...
Dzoni
What some of the comments above do not seem to recognize is that under the current "union," there is a government of Serbia, a government of Montenegro, and a government of "Serbia and Montenegro." Each republic's government deals mostly with "internal issues" while the "union" government of "Serbia and Montenegro" deals mainly with defense, foreign policy, immigration and other matters requiring joint action. (I get all this from the above-linked articles and a few others on Wikipedia, but it all seems logical.) Therefore, I think it is safe to say that the situations discussed above will not occur. There will not suddenly be droves of Montenegrins leaving the Serbian government, because the Montenegrins are not formally represented in the Serbian government; they are represented in their own government and in the "Serbia and Montenegro" government, while the Serbians are represented in THEIR own government and the "Serbia and Montenegro" government. Yes, there are ethnic Serbians whose families are from Montenegro and who may end up in the Serbian government (which was true of Milosevic), and the reverse, but that has nothing to do with the formal structure of the government. And by the way I looked at the article on the current president of Serbia, Boris Tadic, and it appears that contrary to the statement above, he is Serbian all the way. It is the current president of "Serbia and Montenegro," Svetozar Marovic, who is Montenegrin.
Presumably, what will happen now is that the responsibilities for defense, foreign policy etc. will be assumed by each of the republics and the government of "Serbia and Montenegro" will cease to exist, just as occurred with the U.S.S.R. 6SJ7 16:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On, Sunday, May 21 at 21:00 (CEST) (19:00, UTC), the results of the referendum could be ready Should we get rid of this seing as 1900 UTC has passed and there are no results? Horses In The Sky talk contributions
I thought there was 76% yes votes for independence, not 56. This is because I am watching the referendum on RTV BN.
CrnaGora (Talk/Contribs/E-mail/Edit Count) 20:37, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article says:
Are we sure that's actually the question being asked? The source seems unclear. And wouldn't it be asked in Serbian, not English? Melchoir 23:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What is the timetable for the dissolution of the union if there's a 'yes' vote? When would federal institutions be dissolved, or Belgrade's jurisdiction over Montenegro cease? Will there be an immediate declaration of independence followed by a delay while jurisdictional matters binding Montenegro to Serbia are sorted out, or will things be less rushed? Any idea when the EU will officially recognise Montenegro, or when it will formally apply for membership of the UN? Surely these things have been discussed, but there's no mention of them in the article. 129.234.4.1 23:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think I got most of the questions answered (well sourced too, I'll add links to documents later on). Do tell me if some things are unclear, and I'll try to improve it. See current first two sections. --dcabrilo 02:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone willing to write an article on the referendum in 1992 which came out almost unanimously in favour of continued union due to a boycott? Montenegrin independence referendum, 1992. 129.234.4.1 23:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A big chunk of the article was copy/pasted from b92.net (and links were provided). I removed most (all?) of it, but please keep an eye on further copyvios. --dcabrilo 05:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What is the projected date of Montenegro actually splitting from Serbia? Duke Nikola of Montenegro 02:19, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs to discuss what role the Italian prosecution against PM Milo Đukanović played in the referendum.
I think it would be nice to see the results in a table form with the exact percentages of the municipalities in favor and against. Currently the part which is describing the distribution of votes in the municipalities is not easy to read.
It could be done something like:
municipality | in favor | against | reason foobar | 50% | 50% | albanian majority
This makes it easier to read I guess; or would it be too much like the [4] website? --Van der Hoorn 15:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I remember that there were two major polls on the referendum, just before it. Can anyone find them? --PaxEquilibrium 17:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:No to independence-CG.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Montenegrin independence referendum, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Montenegrin independence referendum, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.vecernji-list.hr/newsroom/news/bih/555351/index.do{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level_English.php?cat=Politics&loid=8.0.380123068&par=0When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Montenegrin independence referendum, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.rts.co.yu/jedna_vest.asp?IDNews=145283&belong=&rec=Ma%C5%A1an%20Bu%C5%A1kovicWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]