Contents

Talk:2006 RH120

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects. This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Proposed Name?

[edit]

I am curious if anyone knows whether or not the discoverers have proposed a name yet. Perhaps a minor mythical character that was bound to greater one for a short time? Or maybe after a place, such an ancient city-state that was briefly absorbed into an empire, but quickly reasserted its independence -- maybe something like Tyre, although I am sure there is a better candidate. — Eoghanacht ^talk 19:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another thought is a character associated with Gaia, such as Antaeus (don't know if used already for an astronomical object, and there are obvious symbolic flaws with comparing the giant Anteaus to this boulder). This presupposes that meteoroids can be named at all. — Eoghanacht ^talk 21:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minor planets can not get named until they are numbered. -- Kheider (talk) 03:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.birtwhistle.org/Gallery6R10DB9.htm
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/mpec/K08/K08D12.html

Chesnok (talk) 08:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just moved the article to the new name. — Eoghanacht ^talk 17:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://archive.is/hxee → 2006 RH₁₂₀ was an Apollo-class asteroid using a 2012 epoch. It is sad to see that Archive.isisbanned from Wikipedia. Archive.org does not allow captures of the JPL Small-Body Database due to robots.txt. Hopefully the ban will be appealed someday. -- Kheider (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EASILY RETRIEVABLE OBJECTS AMONG THE NEO POPULATION D. García Yárnoz,* J. P. Sánchez,† and C. R. McInnes† http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.5082v2.pdf

They identify 2006 RH120 as a prime candidate: The lowest cost is of 58 m/s to transfer asteroid 2006 RH120 to a halo southern family with a single burn on 1st February 2021.

It's tough to extract the implications of this from their paper since understanding it involves somewhat advance mathematics. Does anyone know if that paper has been cited in published works intended for more general audiences? The notion that a retrieval of 2006 RH120 is within the realm of current capabilities is "notable" to say the least! (sdsds - talk) 22:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's speed relative to the Earth is often very low. In August 2028 the relative speed compared to Earth will be a very low 0.14 km/s. This low relative speed (and small size) is what allows easier capture of some NEOs. -- Kheider (talk) 01:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2006 RH120. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2006RH120
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509212342/http://www.birtwhistle.org/Gallery6R10DB9.htmtohttp://www.birtwhistle.org/Gallery6R10DB9.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/db_search/show_object?object_id=2006%20RH120
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509212342/http://www.birtwhistle.org/Gallery6R10DB9.htmtohttp://www.birtwhistle.org/Gallery6R10DB9.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927183814/http://home.gwi.net/~pluto/mpecs/6r1.htmtohttp://home.gwi.net/~pluto/mpecs/6r1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]