Contents

Talk:2009 Masters Tournament

A news item involving 2009 Masters Tournament was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 13 April 2009.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Golf Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The image Image:MastersGolfLogo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't "68-68-69=205" be "68+68+69=205"? Or is the convention is to use hyphens? –Howard the Duck 05:26, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The convention is hyphens. Tewapack (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is Harrington's "bad luck" controversial? I don't see a reference stating it is, though the reference does make it a notable event under the appropriate day. CB...(ö) 06:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I would include McIlroy's incident to my "not a controversy" list also. I don't have a recommendation for a section title change, but 'Controversies' seems a bit of a stretch. Farmercarlos (talk) 13:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have to agree with both the statements above. Forgive me for saying it, but it seems that whoever wrote the controversies section seems to dislike the Irish. Bonzostar (talk) 19:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just added a table to represent how the field qualified. Would it be helpful to add other information that would otherwise not qualify them (e.g. world ranks for those outside of the top 50?). Furthermore, would it be helpful to format the table to make it sortable? Thoughts, comments, suggestions in general? If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 09:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2009 Masters Tournament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/10/AR2009041003609.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012024707/http://www.masters.com/en_US/discover/past_winners.htmltohttp://www.masters.com/en_US/discover/past_winners.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PSA: Wjemather has been stealthily and systematically removing past champions without talkpage discussion or consensus. He is currently in violation of 3RR and Wikipedia:Tendentious editing. Regards Jamahiriya (talk) 08:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]