Contents

Talk:2009 Pel-Air Westwind ditching

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 Pel-Air Westwind ditching article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 July 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Transport Mid‑importance 2009 Pel-Air Westwind ditching is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Mid-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Aviation: Accidents This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. This article is supported by the Aviation accident project. Disaster management Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article meets the notability criteria for three reasons:

• Highly publicised
• Successful ditching (a rare event)
• Controversy over why not enough fuel was being carried to divert to another airport (changes to aviation procedures/regulations).

Socrates2008 (Talk) 12:50, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This ditching will be the subject of a 45 minute documentary on the Australian ABC1's program Four Corners on Monday 3 September at 8:30 pm. Dolphin (t) 11:49, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a veteran viewer of any Air Crash Investigation, I found this a horrific documentary - and that was just as a television viewer! It seemed like very high quality journalism, with many of the subjects of he interviews being "First Person": five out of six of the occupants of the plane, several of the people on the ground at NI who helped in the rescue, the airport comms guy at NI airport, high level management at both CASA and ATSB. And significant amounts of actual recordings and video from the day.

The TV show had at least one item that was obviously unknown to the ATSB senior guy being interviewed. I won't include any of the content of the TV show, that would clearly be editorialising. However, despite the ATSB report being marked as "Final", this is clearly not the end of the story.

Finally, in the interests of fairness, it needs to be reported that the pilot was suspended not punitively, but as a routine matter because there immediately existed the possibility of pilot error and excessive fatigue. And that the pilot has now had most of his licences reinstated. 101.161.151.201 (talk) 11:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See 4 Corners. Click on "Show background information". Dolphin (t) 12:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]