This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 15 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Annadubon, Tegan190.
I have changed some of the POV in this article, citing an article from DN, which when read does not talk about State bankrupcy (which never happened) or bank problems (which did not affect the 4 main banks)Pedro cid (talk) 18:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article meets none of wikipedia standards.
It is extremely politicized, polluted with an array of subjective irrelevant judgement and conclusions from the very own editor of the article.
Unsubstantiated op-ed article which needs a complete overhaul to remove the editors opinions, conclusions and unrelated politicized statements or removal
I agree. This article is partial and must be corrected. If the author doesn't do it in a week, I will. Nevertheless, the valuable information is to be kept. Orwell Mill (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2012–2013 Cypriot financial crisis which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:30, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on 2010–14 Portuguese financial crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 3 external links on 2010–14 Portuguese financial crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Can you please refrain from attempting to re-add comments about bureaucracy and the numbers of public employees to this article. The changes you're attempting to make appear in the first instance unsupported (that bureaucracy caused the economic crisis) and in the latter case irrelevant (the number of public employees at the time or years after the government announcement). Combined these comments look more to be attempting to justify the inclusion of your own personal views on the matter into the article rather than it being of relevant historical substance that is well-supported. Apache287 (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]