This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Elections has been postponed already.
Ivoiran Electoral Commission stated it is impossible to hold the election this year,due to delays with registration vote.
I Suggest to change the name of the page to 2009.
Maximiliano -Electoral Calendar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.9.193.29 (talk) 09:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This puts in content to the election section that is not "election" which by precedence sets the results. the lead up to the 2nd round is more relevant to either campaign or something else not as part of the section on results. This lumped everythign into the background and moved issues and pre-election reaction into "election and aftermath."Lihaas (talk) 08:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to work on an article if someone is going to go along behind me and disorganize it. You scattered the content around and lost the chronological narrative. You also separated content from the sources I provided for it. Everyking (talk) 10:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If yo dont want to edit then dont edit it, we work by consensus, i explained what is said and youve refused to discuss it. Youre welcome to constructively edit it and respond to what i said, you are not welcome to take over the article without discussion. Source can duly be fixed, and content was also moved around to wrong section, hence disorganised as well) (Boldly, ill admit there was nothing wrong, but then reverted the change back needs consensus)
At any rate, wikipedia is not a weblog to list everything by timeline (as is oftent he case), it is to organise content in an encyclopaedic manner. (which im not saying is always the case, but it can be worked on)Lihaas (talk) 09:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You've got events from the second round scattered in with events from the first round. Don't you think there should be some distinction? I don't see how an ordinary reader could understand the article the way it's constructed now. Everyking (talk) 13:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, i understand your cocnerns. Perhaps 2 sections within the campaign for the different rounds would be better? The sections moved into election did not match that part.
I did some more reorganization. My main concern is to keep the events happening now—the election itself, and the events following it—separate from the background content about preparations for the election that took place years ago. It's asking a lot for a reader who wants to read about the ongoing controversy to find it in the middle of the article, in between some stuff that happened in 2007. It's fine to sort things into sections; I just want the organization of the article to be roughly in sync with the chronology of events. Everyking (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If the percentages are in contention, then presumably so are the numbers. However, while the two sets of data refer to different rounds of voting, the infobox should make this clear. I,ve added something, but if anyone thinks they can do it more neatly, feel free. Kevin McE (talk) 07:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
User:SamB135 started a page 2010 Ivory Coast crisis. This page, with its long historical run-up, is getting long. I am moving post election material to the new article.
Search for "AFP" Agence France-Presse The AFP is the most used source for this page.
This news source is financed by the French government. It has a history and reputation as a French government propaganda source.
Consider the validity of this source in light of France's involvement in Ivory Coast.
France fought against Ivory Coast. French troops are based in Ivory Coast. France has repeatedly occupied parts of Ivory Coast. The whole history of Ivory Coast has been of struggle to escape from France.
Using the French media as a source is on a par with using Radio Liberty (US CIA funded) as a source on the US war in Vietnam. Incredibly biased propaganda.
I have just modified 2 external links on Ivorian presidential election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 5 external links on Ivorian presidential election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
