This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Whatever it ends up being, the talk page and article were at different names. It won't kill anyone if the article name isn't perfect for 30 minutes. -- Flyguy649talk22:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) I initially confused Nigerien with Nigerian (which is very easy to do), hence the reason I moved the article earlier. I suspect that if you have the article called Nigerien coup d'etat a lot of users are likely to make the same mistake I did --Daviessimo (talk) 23:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well as this item is likely to be featured on the main page sometime soon (through ITN), I would personally suggest leaving the article title for now. I have no opposition to the name being changed once the article is more settled, but given that main page articles can expect thousands of hits a day we could end up with a lot of confusion if we change it now --Daviessimo (talk) 23:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
the 1974 coup's article is named 1974 Nigerien coup d'état, i suggest we take that into account and use 2010 Nigerien coup d'etat to conform to past precendent in addition to the other examples presented above. In order to eliminate confusion you simply redirect this page to the 2010 Nigerien coup d'etat page. Thats the entire reason redirects exist in the first placeXavierGreen (talk) 02:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think there's consensus to move the page to "Nigerien", but in light of Daviessimo's concern I'll wait 24 hours or so, unless of course someone else moves it first. Everyking (talk) 03:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I object to having a "military conflict" infobox in the article. Perhaps some infobox, but this presentation of the event as if it were a war seems a bit silly. Everyking (talk) 04:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
According to the wikipedia article on the President of Niger he was ruling by decree:
"On 27 June, President Tandja announced he was suspending the government and would rule by decree.[47] On 27 June, the leader of the main opposition part, Mahamadou Issoufou, denounced what he called a coup, and called on Nigeriens to resist by all legal means, citing Article 13 of the 1999 Constitution which mandates officials to ignore "manifestly illegal orders"."
Additionally, the opposition party called for rejection of his rule (naturally). This seems to me to be relevant background information.--Senor Freebie (talk) 08:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All that was part of the 2009 constitutional crisis, which is discussed in the article. Tandja wasn't ruling by decree at the time of this coup. Everyking (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The only difference between Nigerian and Nigerien is one vowel. In fact, spellcheck on most applications doesn't even recognize "Nigerien" as a word - It is interpreted as an incorrect spelling of "Nigerian". In order to avoid this confusion I hereby propose that the demonym of Niger be officially changed to something else, perhaps "Nigerese" or taking into account that Niger is a francophone country "Nigerois" might be more fitting. Clearing up this confusion would do much to serve the national interests of both Niger and Nigeria. I welcome thoughts on this matter.
Maybe, but Wikipedia isn't the forum for determining the demonym. The correct demonym in French is nigerien, which in English is capitalized as Nigerien. And spellcheckers aren't arbiters of correct spelling; they are merely tools. -- Flyguy649talk17:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nigerois is in some dictionaries e.g. but is in far less common use. While this designation is confusing, it's no more confusing than say "Georgian". I myself was surprised to see it, but given precedent we should allay confusion in other ways such as a clear first line. --Dhartung | Talk19:48, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment The issue doesn't move me one way or another, but I do think that moving it without a WP:RM is procedurally faulty, since no effort was made to determine consensus, and the page has been renamed a few times already, showing that there is a disagreement in naming, and thus needing a WP:RM to establish consensus formally. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 23:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
support. The article should be named unambiguously, even for those unfamiliar with the minute spelling difference. The title "2010 coup d'etat in Niger" would be far better. This has nothing to do with 'foolishness' as suggested earlier. It's foolish to insist on (perceived) rules when there is a chance of confusion. Kbrose (talk) 22:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Actually, as Niger is a former French colony, perhaps the phrase Nigerois (as is used in reference to French speaking Quebec as Quebecois) would be the correct phrase to use. Either way, "Niger" is clearly stated in the opening and is differentiated from Nigeria, which is a former British colony. As long as that differentiation is clear, there is no need to rename or move the article. DaysOfFuturePassed (talk) 01:34, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Nigerien is correct. Just because some people don't know that, Wikipedia should not in the business of changing either reality or the English language to avoid their personal confusion. T L Miles (talk) 21:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It seems to me that we should consider the referendum of 2010 and the elections of 2011 to be an important later development of this coup. I have added a short section of them to the end of the article. I added relevant wikilinks. I will go on and mention these developments also in the article of the Supreme Council. Also, please note that I don't know how to produce a number separating 'dash.' In LaTeX it would be two hyphens, that is --. Matti Nuortio, Oulu, Finland (talk) 10:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 6 external links on 2010 Nigerien coup d'état. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified one external link on 2010 Nigerien coup d'état. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
