 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Removed the deletion recommendation. There's no reason to believe that an assault rifle was used in the shooting.
There is. See the source I listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sub619 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A long gun is not necessarily an assault rifle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.241.250 (talk) 23:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The original version said assault rifle, but in any case that was no reason to remove the PROD, since there was another reason given: that it was a routine crime. So this now will be taken to AFD.TheLongTone (talk) 06:16, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If the 2012 Montreal shooting can have an article, why can't this one? This shooting is arguably more notable as it is in wake of a series of shootings in the United States. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.153.117.250 (talk) 17:50, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting this article would be a mistake. Thought there are many shootings throughout the nation, this has a very unique aspect to it in that Firefighters were the target. The shooter used arson solely to lure firefighters into range to kill them. There are few documented cases of arson being used in this way, and this alone justifies this article staying visible. Additionally, the ramifications of firefighters needing to slow way down on structure fire because of risk from an assassin is huge. The fire service has worked hard for over 40 years reducing deaths to citizens because of smoke inhalation as house fires. If this shooting is the start of a trend, firefighters will need to wait for law enforcement to clear streets before entering. This delay, even if just a few minutes will cause a an increase to both civillian fire deaths and insurance claims. 2602:306:CF72:6BB0:ADC3:7B92:111F:AEBE (talk) 21:10, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I added material from the NY SAFE Act to clarify and show that this shooting was notable in part for its reaction; the Penal law was changed in part due to this shooting. Bearian (talk) 23:35, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2012 Webster, New York shooting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Waddell, Arizona Buddhist temple shooting which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
