Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
KajMetz, this is not the first time, you insert Israeli Army here, but essentially not much was related with this, except one Israeli solider slightly wounded from spillover fire (maybe even non-deliberate), and the SU-24 was shot down by Israelis near Quneitra with no casualties (which Israelis did that completely regardless of the fighting of Syrian Army with the rebels, but because they claim it penetrated what they consider as Israeli side of the border). It is undue to put Israel (no casualties taken or resulted from the battle with overall 200+ killed) and maybe even UN is redundant as third column, though the role of the UN was much bigger - they participated in a fight, some were taken hostage and eventually all evacuated.GreyShark (dibra) 17:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In the Wikipedia community, there are some editors who insist that Israel supports the anti-Assad forces in Syria, and thus continue to place Israel as a supporter of the rebels in the infobox. I have tried multiple times to correct this by either moving Israel to a third column in the infobox, or by deleting it from the infobox altogether, but I am constantly reverted with little explanation given for the reversion. When I am given an explanation, it is usually a link to a pro-Assad/anti-Israel news source, which is more propaganda than factual information. It is like being in an edit war with the PFLP-GC. Functioning as the voice of reason, I have stated multiple times that Israel supports neither Assad nor the rebels, and is concerned only with securing it's own borders. In an effort to avoid an edit war, I would like to hear information from a reliable source (not a propaganda site or a tabloid news source) that shows proof of direct Israeli military support for the rebels. Otherwise, I will once again remove Israel from the infobox.208.123.183.71 (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to one external link on 2014 Quneitra offensive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
I have just modified one external link on 2014 Quneitra offensive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
