This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
I have just modified 3 external links on 2014 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
If you want to provide facts not opinions, than why this edit returns to the lead mere Zhurova opinion? I also agree with you, that if we want a neutral lead, IOC's assessment of the doping programme should be moved. However, I disagree with you that the evaluation can not be included, it is there to balance all those concerns, which in the lead are included. These are evaluation of journalists, which are very related to the article and to this whole paragraph. Also, if we are going to include independent McLaren Report commissioned by the WADA, we should also mention conclusion of the whole accusation (13 Olympic medals stripped).Jirka.h23 (talk) 10:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why should info on stripped medals not be in the lead? It is a major impact of these issues; they don't just remove medals because they can. There's a reason, it's punishment. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think that all these doping cases is a complete mess now. IOC intends to appeal the CAS decision, and it's just not clear what's going to happen. We shall wait until they finally decide who won these medals. Speaking of the pre-games concerns and controversies, I think they're not a major part of the games. We can keep them but I really don't think that we need to draw a conclusion in the end based on what Thomas Bach (IOC President) and the CSM had said right after the games. Or we need to specify that the games were seen successful from an organizational standpoint only. But again, better not to mention these controversies and not to draw a conclusion. We unanimously decided to remove the IOC's evaluation of the doping program (worst attack on an integrity of the Olympics in history), then why Thomas Bach's comments dating back to 2014 should be in the lead? By the way, I don't see any evaluations in the 2016 Rio Olympics article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djdisiwk78 (talk • contribs)
Can we please stop with the whitewashing here? Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view, and the lead must summarize all key points of the article. Doping, the LGBT issues, and maybe the cost overruns, were a prominent storyline of these games. ViperSnake151 Talk 18:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Russia stripped for 1 gold medal in Biathlon[edit]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
