| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 raid on Idlib city article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
pro-Rebels news agency also reported that Syrian army retook Tall Mastumeh few hours ago - a 2017 reader will be puzzled--78.0.8.44 (talk) 13:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What a lie is being spread over the Attack it was repulsed the same day it was reported and 02 British press agencies claims 70 regime officers dead, even al-Qaeda claims 12 captured, but nothing of 70 beheaded, cmon, SOHR cant lie in this. Whos behind the disinformation british Inteligence Agencies?? Cmon dont believe that.200.48.214.19 (talk) 22:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also the article mentions that ISIS attacked Idlib (while it was Nusra), so the article should not be taken seriously — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.215.136.128 (talk) 11:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Daily mail have showed lack of credability with the article they posted yesterday. As its now the WP article look Ok but with the (alleged) caption after the source.200.48.214.19 (talk) 14:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2014 Idlib city raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
