Contents

Talk:2019 Australian federal election

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2019 Australian federal election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 15 days

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A news item involving 2019 Australian federal election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 18 May 2019.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Politics Mid‑importance 2019 Australian federal election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Mid-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

We've now got Prime Minister after election (via Rfcs) for infoboxes of British & Canadian general/federal election articles. What's the view here, of changing Subsequent Prime MinistertoPrime Minister after election, for Australian federal election articles? GoodDay (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see the old disagreement about the size of a majority has arisen again. This seems to take place in the edit comments but I don't know if a discussion or consensus has taken place, so thought we should raise it here.

The two schools of thought are:

• With 77 seats, the Morrison government holds a three-seat majority in the 151-seat House of Reps, because the majority is worked out by subtracting the number of seats held from the remainder of seats: 77 − (151 − 77) = 3.
• With 77 seats, the Morrison government holds a two-seat majority, because 76 seats is the required number for a one-seat majority and they have one more than that.

You can find references for both:

• "Three-seat majority": Adrian Beaumont (The Conversation), Antony Green, Kevin Bonham
• "Two-seat majority": SBS News, The Canberra Times, SMH

Election analysts and statisticians appear to adhere to the three-seat option, but there are several media references to two seats. My opinion is we should defer to expertise (of the election analysts and statisticians) in this case.

It should also be noted that if three seats should prevail, the working majority in the House would be two seats after the appointment of the Speaker (Reuters). --Canley (talk) 23:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HiLo48: no information was deleted by this edit. What I did was use {{Excerpt}} to have the same results transcluded from Results of the 2019 Australian federal election (Senate)#Australia so that the information is kept at one article & remains consistent across both articles. --Find bruce (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. This is the first time in my over 70 years I have seen the word excerpt used as a vowel. I suspect my English teachers would be rolling in their graves. Sorry for not understanding. HiLo48 (talk) 02:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Oxford Dictionary, "excerpt" has been used as a verb since the middle sixteenth century.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:12, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind the grammar - my 2 word edit summary was lazy & did not achieve the purpose of a brief explanation of my edit, setting out what & why. I will try to do better Find bruce (talk) 03:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]