Contents

Talk:2021 Virginia gubernatorial election

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Virginia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofVirginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: October 31 to November 6, 2021

While Youngkin coalition has a bit of sources, it's not a particularly expansive article and would fit perfectly fine in the main article on the election. TartarTorte 23:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, while the term itself may be pretty common the article itself it's pretty short and can fully fit in this one, so it would be better to either add in this article at the end of all under the bigger title "Aftermath" or directly have it as "Youngkin coalition". ~~~~ SuperGion915 (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, while the Youngkin coalition is notable enough to have a number of sources. It's not a grand movement such as Trumpism to have its own article. I would place the info for the coalition after "Results" and before "Results by county and city" within the main article. ThisUserIsTaken (talk) 8:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Support. As yet, this coalition has no notoriety or relevance outside of the 2021 election. It's likely to remain that way too, given that Youngkin can't run for re-election. -A-M-B-1996- (talk) 04:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Youngkin coalitio 198.86.29.9 (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, he can run for re-election. Just not in 2025. It's four-year terms, non-consecutive. He can run again in 2029. Anyways, that in mind, Support the merge. If the same thing happens again, it can go on the future 2029 Virginia gubernatorial election page. Oath2order (talk) 12:46, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and carried out this merge. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]