 | 24 Hour Psycho has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 10, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from 24 Hour Psycho appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The result was: promotedbyTheleekycauldron (talk) 07:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
)
5x expanded by LunaEatsTuna (talk). Self-nominated at 01:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be loggedatTemplate talk:Did you know nominations/24 Hour Psycho; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]
General eligibility:
- See below.
Policy compliance:
- See below.| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Article expanded on 28 May; while the new version is more than five times longer than the previously existing one, a fair amount consists of verbatim quotes that by my understanding of the DYK rules do not count towards fivefold expansion, and discounting those it comes up just shy of the mark by my count. I see that this is also currently a WP:Good article nominee, so here's what I'll do: I will review the GAN—if it's successful, I'll request a new reviewer for the DYK nomination. If the GAN is not successful but the article is expanded further to such an extent that it meets the fivefold expansion mark within a week, I'll approve the DYK nomination (assuming everything else is okay, of course).
On with the DYK review: All sources are, as far as I can tell, reliable for the material they are cited for. There are no obvious neutrality issues. Earwig reveals no copyvio, but there is some WP:Close paraphrasing. The hook is both cited and interesting. QPQ has been done. Some comments about the content:
Brown also claimed that as a substantial part of Douglas' work, 24 Hour Psycho has been "shown all over the world"– I would parse this use of "as" as "it has been shown all over the world, as has a significant proportion of Douglas' other creations", but what the source says is "The renown of 24 Hour Psycho has made it a substantial part of Douglas's biography [...]", in other words saying that it is "a substantial part" rather than has similarities with a substantial part.
two side-by-side projections of 24 Hour Psycho—one running forwards and the other backwards—until both films meet in the middle for an identical, one-second shot– I would say this is WP:Close paraphrasing of the source's "two side-by-side projections of 24 Hour Psycho, with one running forward and one running backward, until both films meet in the middle for an identical, one-second shot", but it's more like an unattributed quote.
Ping LunaEatsTuna. TompaDompa (talk) 04:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
needs a new, uninvolved reviewer. TompaDompa (talk) 23:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cleared GA on 10 June, after being posted, so I'm going to go with "inside time frame". Hook is interesting and directly cited, and the only close quoting is actual quotes. Long enough, well cited, GTG. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
|
|
| Reviewing |
|
|
Reviewer: TompaDompa (talk · contribs) 04:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will review this. See Template:Did you know nominations/24 Hour Psycho. TompaDompa (talk) 04:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
two side-by-side projections of 24 Hour Psycho—one running forwards and the other backwards—until both films meet in the middle for an identical, one-second shot– I would say this is WP:Close paraphrasing of the source's "two side-by-side projections of 24 Hour Psycho, with one running forward and one running backward, until both films meet in the middle for an identical, one-second shot", but it's more like an unattributed quote. This recurs in the body.
causing reflection on both sides of the screen so that it may be viewed from either sideis not quite the right way to put this. The source's "reflection" is in the figurative sense of "contemplation" or "meditation". Simply removing "causing reflection on both sides of the screen" would solve this.
This, which Gordon calls an "act of curiosity", inspired him to create 24 Hour Psycho.– I'm guessing you misheard due to Gordon's Scottish accent. He says "active curiosity" (because, as he says, "idle curiosity" is a contradiction in terms).
Brown also claimed that as a substantial part of Douglas' work, 24 Hour Psycho has been "shown all over the world"– I would parse this use of "as" as "it has been shown all over the world, as has a significant proportion of Douglas' other creations", but what the source says is "The renown of 24 Hour Psycho has made it a substantial part of Douglas's biography [...]", in other words saying that it is "a substantial part" rather than has similarities with a substantial part.
In 2010, Gordon created a second installation entitled 24 Hour Psycho Back and Forth and To and Fro– this source says 2008.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Ping LunaEatsTuna. TompaDompa (talk) 19:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
two identical screens installed side by side, with Douglas's film playing in full on each: forward on one, backward on the other, with one flipped left to right such that—at exactly twelve hours in—they present the same images, mirrored, in a kind of exquisite, time-limited film version of a Rorschach inkblot test.TompaDompa (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
