Contents

Talk:2nd United States Congress

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Congress High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Untitled[edit]

• This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
• suggestions for future improvements:

1. supplemental Senate & House committees article
2. supplemental district maps article
3. narrative for major legislation
4. narrative for major events

stilltim 21:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there an image of Independence Hall (United States) on this page if the Congress met at Congress Hall while in Philadelphia? Best, epicAdam^(talk) 05:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a conflict as to when Thomas Tredwell began his representation of New York's 1st congressional district. Please see Talk:Thomas Tredwell#Congressional service dates conflict. —Markles 10:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It says that during part of the session there was an anti-administration majority in the intro but is not supported by the text? is something missing or should it be removed? I see no basis to this claim. Stidmatt (talk) 03:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• You're right! Change it.—GoldRingChip 13:07, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2nd United States Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060601025644/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/cdocuments/hd108-222/index.htmltohttp://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/cdocuments/hd108-222/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]