Contents

Talk:30 September Movement

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 30 September Movement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 30, 2008, October 1, 2009, and October 1, 2010.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indonesia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia / Cold War C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Southeast Asian military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

The subtitle "A Purely Internal Army Affair: the PKI and the 'Cornell Paper' " is pretty lengthy and rough. Might someone see a more succinct and elegant phrase? Smilo Don 17:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Surprised this isn't linked yet: Pengkhianatan G30S/PKI. Considering the role it played in propagating the government's version... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article states that Dipa Nusantra Aidit was killed on November 25. His Wikipedia page claims he was killed on November 22. I do not know which date is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.136.18.95 (talk) 02:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A great resource is the CIA's official intelligence report (pdf here) that was compiled in 1968 and later declassified under the FOIA. It states that the term coup in its common usage (as an attempted overthrow) "might be misleading" (image). It seems laziness or lack of interest in revealing the truth (because they were communists) left many sources poorly put together. Shouldn't this be corrected? Bataaf van Oranje (talk) 16:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

按照古兰经说法不信仰伊斯兰教的都是卡费勒，真主赐予穆斯林的财富都被卡费勒也就是印尼华人抢去了必须用圣战方式夺回来。希望散落世界各地的华人要警惕穆斯林。另外，无论是天主教还是犹太教或者是保守主义，对穆斯林来说那都是邪教。Jg451 (talk) 13:58, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The responsibility for the coup is actually a matter of historic debate and interpretation. You have different people arguing on who is responsible. But it there is one certainty, the September 30 movement was made up of a group of mid ranking military officers. However to muddy the waters, you had the British keen to blame it on PKI for their own agenda.[1] Ultimately when you read the article, some argue that the PKI played a significant role in the events leading up to the coup attempt, citing its growing influence and alleged involvement in subversive activities. Others contend that the military and other anti-communist forces used the coup attempt as a pretext to purge the PKI and eliminate political opposition. Ultimately "there is no credible evidence that Sukarno knew about it beforehand, or that the PKI as an organisation or its mass membership were responsible for it". https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/17/slaughter-in-indonesia-britains-secret-propaganda-war So for those constantly not doing research and hastily changing the article into one narrative that's unsourced and unproven. Either stop or discuss here and show your sources. I reverted the article back to the last long standing neutral version.[2] 49.180.246.45 (talk) 09:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]