This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
The table in the "Armouries" section was intended to provide information on the historic designation(s) of each armoury under the "Designated" column. However, the table in that column instead refers to the Canadian Register of Historic Places (CRHP) and the "Register of the Government of Canada Heritage Buildings" (the Directory of Federal Heritage Designations, or DFHD). Neither the CRHP nor the DFHD are historic designations - they are simply directories which provide information on the actual heritage designation(s) which apply to sites across the country (see WP:WHATISCRHP). We need to replace the nonsensical references to the CRHP and DFHD with references to the actual designations. I can't do so at the moment, so I've tagged the section, but will return to do it in the near future if someone has not already done so.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To the anonymous account that keeps deleting the brigade's NATO map symbol without discussion, please stop. There was a reference provided that proves the uses and, your personal opinion aside, the Canadian Army still uses NATO symbology for map marking and tactical signs. CdnMCG (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
