 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I changed the text to reflect the fact that in 1988 there were four full rifle companies, not a flyover company and three rifle companies. I know this, because I was in 12 PL, P Coy, 3RCR at that time.
The information that has been added about a single platoon commander is not notable and should not be added to the article, in my opinion. Not only is it not cited, but it does not seem significant to me. Presumably there have been many platoon commanders in this battalion since its establishment (considering there are usually three to a company and about three to five companies in a battalion, there would be about 9 to 15 platoon commanders at any one time, I suppose), why would one be more notable than all the others? However, as it stands the continual addition of this information appears to be disruptive to me. Other editors have also considered this as non-notable, hence the reason it has been removed/reverted on a number of occasions. Indeed the page was protected for a period of time because of this. Instead of continuing to add it in to the article in a drive-by fashion and have someone come along and revert, perhaps we could discuss why the information should be added to the article? If User:Lt. Hasrin and the various IPs that keep adding this wish to have a discussion about this information, please state your case for it here on the talk page and it can be discussed. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:14, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Naht to mention they switch every year —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.33.254 (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, the information regarding the battalion CO is no longer accurate. Lt. Col. Quick stepped down in 2013 and handed over command to Lt. Col. Rob McBride, who handed over command to Lt. Col. Will Graydon a couple of weeks ago. http://www.thedailyobserver.ca/2013/06/06/an-action-packed-change-of-command-for-3rcr http://www.thedailyobserver.ca/2015/06/21/new-era-begins-for-the-3rd-battalion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.189.3 (talk) 05:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 3rd Battalion, The Royal Canadian Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
