Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Missing categories  
1 comment  




2 Best Regional Mexican Album (Including Tejano) is the new category  
1 comment  




3 Multiple Nominations/Awards  
2 comments  




4 Edit request on 27 January 2013  
2 comments  




5 chronology  
1 comment  




6 abbreviations are not encyclopaedic.R&B is Rhythm and blues.  
2 comments  




7 Over-mention of male artists/winners  
2 comments  




8 External links modified  
1 comment  













Talk:55th Annual Grammy Awards




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Missing categories[edit]

I am missing a lot of nominations --Melly42 (talk) 09:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regional Mexican Album (Including Tejano) is the new category[edit]

Hello guys, I've seen that somebody replaced the category "Best Regional Mexican Album (Including Tejano)" for "Best Regional Mexican or Tejano Album". And that is completely wrong. The Best Regional Mexican Album (Including Tejano) is a brand new category created for the 55th Grammy Awards... It differs from the previous Regional Mexican or Tejano awarded last year because this one includes other forms of mexican regional music such as banda, grupera, norteño, etc... Please discuss. Tony0106 (talk) 23:11, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Nominations/Awards[edit]

Some of the bands and performers listed under those receiving multiple nominations are listed under the wrong numerical. For example, Alabama Shakes is listed as having having received two nominations, while, in reality, they received three. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.137.149.77 (talk) 02:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Oregon Symphony received two nominations (plus Blanton Alspaugh won for producing an Oregon Symphony recording, among others); perhaps the orchestra should be added to the list as well? --Another Believer (Talk) 16:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 27 January 2013[edit]

Credits for record of the year should be updated.

http://www.grammy.com/nominees

Current WIKI page "We Are Young" – Fun featuring Janelle Monáe Jeff Bhasker, producer Jeff Bhasker, Andrew Dawson & Stuart White, engineers/mixers; Chris Gehringer, mastering engineer

Grammy website: Jeff Bhasker, producer; Jeff Bhasker, Andrew Dawson, Ken Lewis, Pawel Sek & Stuart White, engineers/mixers; Chris Gehringer, mastering engineer

Credits for Album of the year should be updated.

Current WIKI page Some Nights – Fun Janelle Monáe, featured artist; Jeff Bhasker, Emile Haynie, Jake One & TommyD, producers; Jeff Bhasker, Pete Bischoff, Jeff Chestek, Andrew Dawson, Emile Haynie, Manny Marroquin, Sonny Pinnar & Stuart White, engineers/mixers; Chris Gehringer, mastering engineer

Grammy website: Janelle Monáe, featured artist; Jeff Bhasker, Emile Haynie, Jake One & TommyD, producers; Jeff Bhasker, Pete Bischoff, Jeff Chestek, Rich Costey, Andrew Dawson, Emile Haynie, Ken Lewis, Manny Marroquin, Sonny Pinnar, Pawel Sek & Stuart White, engineers/mixers; Chris Gehringer, mastering engineer

Thank you

Peterwall891 (talk) 08:17, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: This page is no longer protected. Subject to consensus, you should be able to edit it yourself. — Forgot to put name (talk) 09:28, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

chronology[edit]

Why not start this article with the oldest music and work your way through to the latest. So If there was an award for Gregorian chant recording, that would be first. Otherwise it is just a list of "popular appeal opinion" and hardly encyclopeadic. Just because some pop vocalist is a big deal this year is basically a very small and unimportant thing when you look at history. Start at the beginnng and go towards the current. 208.72.122.243 (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

abbreviations are not encyclopaedic.R&B is Rhythm and blues.[edit]

R&B is the only abbreviation in this article. Why? Using that short form is not encyclopaedic! It should be rendered in complete form. "Rhythm and Blues". Otherwise, the article should use only abbreviations: P for pop and R&R for rock and roll. This ought ot be obvious. What is so special about Rhythm and Blues that it gets an abbreviation? This is not a pop music site. It is an encyclopaedia. I will not rewrite it, but the people that are editing this article should. Thank you.

208.72.122.243 (talk) 10:16, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We name the categories according to the Grammy Website: "R&B Field". Also, it is obvious what R&B means in music ("Rhythm and blues, often abbreviated to R&B and RnB"), but what is PorR&R in music? Frankly, your comment has no sense, nobody calls pop as "P" or rock as "R". Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Over-mention of male artists/winners[edit]

I can't help but notice that twice in the lead section there are mentions of how the nominees/winners were mostly male. While I'm not saying it's not factual, isn't this leading for someone to infer that the Grammys are sexist in their choices? — Preceding unsigned comment added by QWERTYHateMachine (talkcontribs) 14:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The lead section mentioning the maleness of the awards also seems to me to be inferring that the Grammy nominations are sexist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mindgames11 (talkcontribs) 19:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 55th Annual Grammy Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:55th_Annual_Grammy_Awards&oldid=1197064376"

Categories: 
Wikipedia In the news articles
List-Class awards articles
Low-importance awards articles
List-Class Grammy Awards task force articles
Mid-importance Grammy Awards task force articles
Awards articles
List-Class California articles
Low-importance California articles
WikiProject California articles
List-Class List articles
Low-importance List articles
WikiProject Lists articles
List-Class United States articles
Low-importance United States articles
List-Class United States articles of Low-importance
List-Class American music articles
Mid-importance American music articles
WikiProject American music articles
WikiProject United States articles
Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
 



This page was last edited on 19 January 2024, at 06:24 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki