 | 63rd Street lines has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 20, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 63rd Street Line, a three-station subway line in New York City, was initially described as a "tunnel to nowhere" because it had no connections to other subway lines in the borough of Queens?
| ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the IND 63rd Street Line page were merged into 63rd Street lines. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the BMT 63rd Street Line page were merged into 63rd Street lines. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Zoo York Wall page were merged into 63rd Street lines. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I have been adding references to this article. I have found a few good possible references.
I hope to make this article a good article. --Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 63rd Street Lines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
|
|
| Reviewing |
|
|
Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 06:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am quickfailinig this article largely for violating WP:WIAGA #2. There are large swaths of uncited text, including several entire paragraphs. No paragraph should be without citation since each should present a new idea in a well-organized article. There are even instances of successive uncited paragraphs.
The New York Times is a great WP:RS, you may want to broaden to other sources as you complete the citation request above although it is not required.
I would also encourage merging or expanding stubby paragraphs.
Also dollar amounts greater than 10 years old should probably have dollar conversions. See how they are employed in articles such as Bobby OrrorJackie Robinson.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Archer Avenue Lines which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
