Contents

Talk:78th Golden Globe Awards

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 78th Golden Globe Awards article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Awards Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. California: Los Angeles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofCalifornia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance). Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Cinema / Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: February 28 to March 6, 2021 (8th)

Anyone think that we should add a section talking about the controversies regarding the nominations of "Music" and "Emily in Paris"

Trivia: This is the first time three women have been nominated for Best Director. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.197.248.182 (talk) 04:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the person above - I haven’t heard about the “Emily in Paris” controversy but I definitely have heard of the Music controversy. 146.90.19.218 (talk) 23:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After leaving my last message a few minutes ago, I searched up “golden globe controversies” and MANY articles came up - notably, one from the Independent names the “Emily in Paris” controversy among others. ^[1] 146.90.19.218 (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As long as both controversies are sourced and related to the Golden Globes, anyone can add them. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added a controversy section. 146.90.19.218 (talk) 19:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hammersoft has removed some information regarding the Music controversy. Many edits and reverts have been made since then. In fear of breaking 3RR, I'm not going to revert this but I will point out the existence of this article from a source deemed reliable. Would this be breaking any policies for inclusion (for example, can you use the same source (Independent) twice?). Also, I should point out that I am the same person who created the COntroversy section, I just have an account now EvanTaylor1289 (talk) 11:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know there are no rules against using the same newspaper as a source multiple times, as long as it is deemed a reliable one (which the Independent largely is). If you are looking for sources, Music (2021 film) has a fairly large number of sources more focused around the film than the globes, but might assist you. 94.13.35.21 (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yossymen: I have reverted a change you have made to this page because I feel it violates Wikipedia:SOAPBOX and Wikipedia:No original research (since the source you used is very similar to your username). If you disagree with this, you can discuss in the chat and then rerevert it. EvanTaylor1289 (talk) 11:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]