Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 in Cuba  
1 comment  




2 Current operators?  
4 comments  




3 Accuracy credible, for an unguided missile?  
2 comments  













Talk:9K52 Luna-M




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


in Cuba[edit]

These missiles were put in CUBA to destroy a US invasion. (Peter Jennings - The Missiles of October: What the world Didn't Know (1992))

My Cuban friends observed these missiles in Cuba years after all missiles were supposed to be removed. Eventually the USSR removed the missiles because they did not want the Cubans using them. Saltysailor (talk) 18:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Current operators?[edit]

Is the list of current operators up-to-date? I can hardly believe, that e.g. Hungary or Slovakia, which are NATO members, have nowadays active units of FROG 7... This system is hopelessly outdated and incompatible with NATO standards.--84.163.115.160 (talk) 00:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

also Cuba is not in the list ???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.158.178.59 (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Hezbollah–500+ (Supplied by Iran)" Anyone else finding this EXTREMELY unlikely? An organization receiving 5 HUNDRED of these rather large rockets when no other nation currently has anywhere near that number. Any source at all for this? 98.156.97.183 (talk) 02:55, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw that and couldn't believe that Hezbollah had twice as many FROG-7s as the Egyptian army. I did a cursory google search and found a couple articles without numbers attached. However, the statistic could be a misreading of this [1] USAF report. The author says Hezbollah had 500 Fajr rockets and "a few dozen" Zelzal-2s [2] as of 2006. You'll notice the little snark about Iranian liaison officers on that page as well. Honestly, there doesn't seem to be concrete proof that they even have any, much less 500 - it seems like speculation; for instance, I saw this [3] cited on a blog advocating the Israeli war with Lebanon back in '06, and there is no real proof on that page whatsoever. On the other hand, what seems to be a Lebanese-leaning source (which is much different than a Hezbollah-leaning source, but still) [4] says there were claims prior to the '06 war of Hezbollah Zelsals but they apparently were never used and it is unknown if and how many were destroyed by Israeli airpower. The number should be removed, and something like "speculated" added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balkan shuffle (talkcontribs) 08:14, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Lambeth, Benjamin S. (2011). Air Operations in Israel's War Against Hezbollah: Learning from Lebanon and Getting It Right in Gaza. ISBN 9780833058430.
  • ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zelzal-2
  • ^ http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/zelzal-2.htm
  • ^ http://www.lebanonwire.com/0803MLN/08032810STR.asp
  • Accuracy credible, for an unguided missile?[edit]

    Is the accuracy quoted (700 m [CEP I assume] at 70 km range) well established? That seems remarkable for an unguided, spin-stabilized missile. Wwheaton (talk) 03:14, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    I retract my doubt, which seems due to ignorance. The US Honest John, which is generally similar, is reported to have slightly better accuracy (expressed as angle, that is, CEP/range). Wwheaton (talk) 03:36, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:9K52_Luna-M&oldid=1197116421"

    Categories: 
    Start-Class military history articles
    Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
    Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
    Start-Class weaponry articles
    Weaponry task force articles
    Start-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
    Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
    Start-Class Russia articles
    Low-importance Russia articles
    Low-importance Start-Class Russia articles
    Start-Class Russia (technology and engineering) articles
    Technology and engineering in Russia task force articles
    WikiProject Russia articles
    Hidden categories: 
    Military history articles needing attention to referencing and citation
    Military history articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
    Military science, technology, and theory articles needing attention to referencing and citation
    Military science, technology, and theory articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
    Weaponry articles needing attention to referencing and citation
    Weaponry articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
    Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles needing attention to referencing and citation
    Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
     



    This page was last edited on 19 January 2024, at 09:42 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki