 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REMOVED THIS COMMENT AS IT IS NOT NEEDED>109.159.191.147 (talk) 12:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
y do indians always put their own ideas in watever they r writing on the net,protraying pakistan as a demon and india as a hero?! wat loot and rape? havent u read "raw and bangladesh" by zain-ul-abidin and "blood and tears" by qutbuddin aziz????? first read them then give ur wikipedia (sickipedia) articles. and for heavens dnt give ur personnel views in it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.156.69.98 (talk) 07:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
An image used in this article, File:ChawindaBattel.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Amir Abdullah Khan Niazi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=totrue
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Amir Abdullah Khan Niazi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on A. A. K. Niazi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"From the mass of evidence coming before the War Enquiry Commission from witnesses, both civil and military, there is little doubt that Niazi came to acquire a bad reputation in sex matters, and this reputation has been consistent during his postings in Sialkot, Lahore and East Pakistan.[63] The allegations regarding his indulgence in the export of Pan by using or abusing his position in the Eastern Command and as Commander of his command also prima facie appear to be well-founded.[64]"
Not only is this poorly written but the sources does not support it, can we delete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 133.175.178.17 (talk) 15:34, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
At the Article’s beginning there should be featured
“commonly known as General Niazi” 49.185.149.109 (talk) 08:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
the following edit of 18:53, 28 June 2023 by User:Tayyib M221 has removed the "Punjabi" part from the subject's early life ethnic background.
Could it please be added back RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The origin of a statement in this article appears to be a 2003 op-ed by Sarmila Bose in the Pakistani Daily Times where she wrote:
Only two ‘Indian’ officers were chosen to be decorated by the Viceroy at that ceremony — ‘Tiger’ Niazi was one of them.
— Sarmila Bose (24 November 2003). "The courageous Pak army stand on the eastern front". Daily Times (Op-ed). Archived from the original on 2004-08-14.
WP:RSEDITORIAL warns that op-eds "are rarely reliable for statements of fact". They don't undergo the same fact-checking process as a newspaper's news content. They are sometimes written by academics, but don't undergo peer review as scholarship does. WP:REDFLAG says "any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources". Extensive Google searches and searches of WP:TWL databases found no repetition of the above claim in a reliable source.
Ironboy11 added Bose's statement in this edit on 8 July 2011. A week later, he changed it to:
Only two Indian officers were chosen to be decorated by the Viceroy at that ceremony — ‘Tiger’ Niazi was one of them and the other being Lieutenant Sam Manekshaw.
He received a strong warning in August 2011, his last before being blocked indefinitely, about original research.
He seems to have taken a story from a questionable source and embellished it. Like a good hoax/lie, it has elements of truth. However, it's highly unlikely that out of all the Indians who received awards for the Burma Campaign, only these two would have been chosen to be decorated by the Viceroy at that particular ceremony. If it had really happened that way, and if it were important, someone else would have written about it somewhere more reliable than a modern day newspaper op-ed.
Therefore, I've removed the story. If anyone can identify multiple high-quality sources that recount Niazi's involvement in it, they're welcome to add it back. --Worldbruce (talk) 08:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Nabilahammed02 (talk) 14:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Jamedeus (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
