Contents

Talk:A303 road

	A303 road has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 24, 2016 Good article nominee Listed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A303 road article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Somerset Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Highways: United Kingdom Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force. This article's junction list has been marked as needing attention. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Devon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hampshire Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Wiltshire Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

Salisbury and Yeovil are not on the A303 so should they be included here as primary destinations? ZoeL (talk) 15:12, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you on about? Yeovil is directly south of the A303! FM [ talk to me | show contributions ]  16:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I have edited as appropriate to bring it in line with other roads. PD's are only listed when they are on the road in question. jenuk1985 (talk) 18:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renumbered roads. There is an old road sign in Hindon that shows the A303 was routed through this small town. The road is now B3089, The A303 passes north now but does not look like a bypass at this point. Does anyone know more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.207.217 (talk) 21:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC) Sorry my mistake apparently this is an old sign that means "way to A303" (black and white striped bar on yellow background) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.207.217 (talk) 22:10, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Improvements

I amended this section because half the road from Stonehenge westward is single carriageway, (effectively because of Stonehenge). The figure was derived by creating a route in Mapmem OS software. Distances given in following table.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.3.255.103 (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:A303 road/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 08:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We could really use a map locator, and a Bing/Google map external link to show the road. Perhaps Tagishsimon could make a route map for the route from OSM?♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I don't think this looks as good as the maps Tagishsimon did for you though, so feel free to tweak / change as necessary. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; this is beyond my skills ... Ritchie333, could you email me whatever you have on the A303 (per this comment and I'll see if I can convert it into KML. My mapmaking so far is just exporting a PNG from OSM and identification of the bounding coorindinates ... your Sabre derived map looks as good as it'll get. --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks beautiful Ritchie333 but we could still use an external bing/google map link at the top right you often see on good road articles. I had to click the photo to get an external link to a map!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look and this is bloody complicated. I have set up the link but the map looks shit. I don't know how to fix it, sorry. Tagishsimon - help! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Link Yarnbury Castle

Done Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "Then single carriageway again" -appears to be in note form

Done (personally I find things like this describe the route better, but can't summarise it in two minutes) Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "The route is more south westerly " -can this be reworded like "heads in a more southwesterly direction" or something?

I've given this section a trim. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Harrow Way and Fosse Way, some further background info would be useful here. How old were those? That wouldn't be 19th century of course..

I've expanded this, and split all the pre New Direct Road history into a separate "early history" sub-section as I think it's long enough Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:36, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "eventually becoming one of the most important in England." -vague, when was this? Seems a bit dubious

I've dropped in a note from the source, which says『In the 18th and 19th century, the annual market at Weyhill Fair was a significant trading event in the calendar both locally and nationally. It is reputed to have been one of the nation’s largest and most famous annual fairs and the most important downland fair in the nation ever held until the 1950’s』Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Not sure "adopted" is the right word

I've trimmed this down a bit Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "a ten-mile radius" -use convert

Done Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The government cancelled the whole scheme at the end of 2007.[37] -due to the expense, or other factors too?

Mostly environmental problems, it seems. I've clarified that. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "A number of other schemes for the remainder of the below-standard parts of the A303 have been considered,[46] but then cancelled in 1998.[4" -a bit vague, are there any examples you could briefly identify?

I've pulled some information out of the source, and clarified. I don't believe it's OR to transcribe a source saying "Sparkford - Ilchester" as "around Yeovilton". Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: All done except getting the map file working, any other issues? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I can see, it's sufficient for GA.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: The map links for Bing and Google don't seem to be working..♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented the link out as it just doesn't seem to want to play ball. There are some instructions here but that's more geared to around creating a trace from scratch, not reuse something that already works. I'll have to ask around. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:55, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A303 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/network/strategic/programme/tpi/southwestregion
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303192306/http://southwest-ra.gov.uk/media/SWRA/RFA2%202008/RFA2_Transport_response_South_West_from_DFT_July_09.pdftohttp://southwest-ra.gov.uk/media/SWRA/RFA2%202008/RFA2_Transport_response_South_West_from_DFT_July_09.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A303 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303201959/http://www.swarmms.org.uk/documents/PLAN%20Lon-Exe%20corr%20v2.pdftohttp://www.swarmms.org.uk/documents/PLAN%20Lon-Exe%20corr%20v2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]