Contents

Talk:AK-102

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force. This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Page title

[edit]

The page has the title "AK-102 assault rifle", all other AK rifles are just named "AK-101", "AK-103" etc. Which option is standard? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.234.244 (talk) 22:13, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, IP editor of 2012. The page name has since been corrected to AK-102. It is NOT AK-102 assault rifle; you were correct!--FeralOink (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AK-102. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120216091731/http://milparade.udm.ru/27/026.htmtohttp://milparade.udm.ru/27/026.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Ak102.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the article today, and added four sources, as well as an External Links section with a fifth source. I decided that that there is now a sufficient number of citations, and removed the "more sources needed" tag. If other editors feel that the tag should be restored, let's discuss it here.-- FeralOink (talk) 06:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]