![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Aboriginal title in the Marshall Court has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 4, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the two earliest aboriginal title cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall were examples of collusive litigation?
|
GA toolbox |
---|
|
Reviewing |
|
Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 06:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since Cirt has went inactive based on recent edits, I'll take over this GA review. I'll take a look at the article this weekend. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 06:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the issues I found:
Just a couple small things. I'll put the article on hold and pass it when they're fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
> the remarks of the Court on aboriginal title during this period are dicta.[1]
Could this be clarified? Per my layman's reading this means that although the remarks are considered authoritative, they are not legally binding. Is this accurate?
-- 2600:6C55:6D00:148F:B9D3:46FB:40D6:753A (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]