This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sadly Nobody seems to ever notice the huge ammounts of vandalism on this page. It is an experiment to see how long it will go until someone notice them and changes the vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whm2 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very Well, the game is over, and someone else is Visual Effects trivia smart enough to recognize the vandalsim. User:Whm2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whm2 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll stop. Sorry. I've done this before, but I know it's stupid. -whm2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whm2 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC) And you don't need friggin protetcion when except around oscar time im like the only personb who goes on this page let alone vandalsises it![reply]
How about citing the sources of where this all came from, anything like imdb.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.37.243 (talk) 23:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Currently the article only lists the winning films. It really ought to list the actual winners. -ErinHowarth (talk) 06:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What? The page does list the films that won along with those who were nominated.Crboyer (talk) 23:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't we list a page for the ancestor of this award, the Special Effects Oscar? We list the pages for other archaic Oscars. Why not that one?Crboyer (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For those who don't know, the ancestor of this award was "Best Special Effects." It started in 1939; in 1963, it was split into two: Best Visual Effects and Best Sound Editing.Crboyer (talk) 23:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can we add a section that list the pre-nominated films?--Norgizfox5041 (talk) 21:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Was just thinking-there should be a template for the people that have won, granted it was a special achievement for a while and was under another name as well. Wgolf (talk) 22:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Academy Awards which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Academy Award for Best Visual Effects. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Academy Award for Best Visual Effects. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]