Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Shelf life section  
1 comment  




2 Science of the bonding properties  
1 comment  




3 Oreo example  
1 comment  




4 BP?!?  
4 comments  




5 Plastic Wrap  
2 comments  




6 Polyvinyl acetate  
2 comments  




7 Birdlime  
1 comment  




8 History  
2 comments  


8.1  Animal glue  







9 Sex and glue  
2 comments  




10 "Glue" vs. "Adhesive"  
1 comment  




11 Applications  
1 comment  




12 Recent Edit to Preview and History Section  
1 comment  




13 overly general?  
2 comments  




14 One-part vs. 2-part adhesives  
1 comment  




15 External links modified  
1 comment  




16 'broken' reference  
1 comment  




17 Working temperature ranges  
1 comment  




18 "Chemical weld" glues  
1 comment  




19 "Liquid nails" listed at Redirects for discussion  
1 comment  













Talk:Adhesive




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Shelf life section

[edit]

This section seems to be fairly minor, since it doesn't offer very specific information (ie. "Some glues have a limited shelf life" doesn't tell us much). Maybe this needs to be incorporated into the particular examples as sorted by reactiveness? — SelectivelyPermeableStudent (talk) 18:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Science of the bonding properties

[edit]

I was looking for an explaination/understanding of the science of how the glue adheres to the surfaces being glued, ie is it surface tension, chemical bonding, electostatic forces or what. This could be good information for understanding why different adhesives work with different materials and why they may fail. I know nothing on the subject so really needs some expert/chemist with some time to write something. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.51.39.214 (talk) 01:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oreo example

[edit]

What's with the Oreo example? That isn't international - Oreos are generally confined to the US of A. Mort42 (talk) 19:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BP?!?

[edit]

OK, so a bunch of new-world order types don't like AD/BC and instead insist on CE/BCE. Now, WTF is BP supposed to stand for in the way it is used in this article? First guess was "before people" but that doesn't really make any sense given that the article is about glue. Might have worked in an article about dinosaurs tho.

Can someone in charge just make up their f'n mind about what standard we are going to use, and then make sure we stick to it? I grudgingly accepted the idea that authors of articles about non-christian religions and cultures might want BCE/CE, but am lost as to what BP might mean here. "Before Petroleum"? Except that would be wrong, since tars have always been available on certain sandy beaches ... Zaphraud (talk) 22:41, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note .. if it is "before people", the idea that obviously intelligent non-homo sapiens should not also be considered "people" in terms of discussing the accomplishments of their civilization is at least as offensive to the ideals of equality as any religion-based date system ever was - at least AD/BC doesn't re-classify members of any civilization as animals. Zaphraud (talk) 22:45, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It means "before present"; in other words it's synonymous with "ago". Ewulp (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Before_Present, BP means "before 1950". 94.30.84.71 (talk) 20:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plastic Wrap

[edit]

"Plastic wrap displays temporary adhesive properties as well." Really? So does jelly but that doesn't make it an adhesive. Shouldn't this be removed? Shepherdtech (talk) 23:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I've removed it. Wizard191 (talk) 23:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Polyvinyl acetate

[edit]

Isnt polyvinyl acetate a thermoplastic? It appears as thermosetting in the article? Sturgman (talk) 18:10, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I fixed it. Thanks! Wizard191 (talk) 23:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Birdlime

[edit]

How well does traditional birdlime stand up against adhesives on the modern market? (I ask because I can't picture capturing birds on the branch using any of the usual stuff) Wnt (talk) 21:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History

[edit]

The history section presents a somewhat misleading picture.

141.151.82.232 (talk) 00:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Animal glue

[edit]

At least in the mid-20th century, and perhaps even at present, hot animal glue was preferred by luthiers for joining the top plate (front) (and, probably, the back) of a violin (and other similar stringed instruments) to the ribs (sides). It can be cracked apart for repairs with minimal or no damage to the wood. As well, it was the adhesive/sealant of choice for pipe-organ building and repairs, at least by some workers in that field. I can remember as a child in the 1940s watching my parents heat up brown translucent flakes of animal glue in a hot pot (water-jacketed)? It was applied hot, and perhaps bonded well as soon as it was cool; I'm not sure. It had a distinctive odor.

It would not be surprising to find that animal and fish glues are still used by some makers of folk instruments worldwide. Nikevich (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sex and glue

[edit]

The first line of the second paragraph begins "Adhesives are used for adventurous sex positions, gluing you genitals to a wall ;)". No citation is given and wink makes me suspicious. Orangutanlibrarian (talk) 10:42, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Orangutanlibrarian[reply]

Fixed. Grantmidnight (talk) 16:23, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Glue" vs. "Adhesive"

[edit]

I was rather disappointed, although I'm not an expert, by what seems to be lack of rigor in the use of these terms in what, on the whole, strikes me as an excellent article. While I'm no professional in the field, I have been quite interested in adhesives for just about all my life (I'm almost 76).

There's no denying that common usage (in English) prefers the term "glue"; it's monosyllabic, and universally understood. "Adhesive", imho, can run the risk of seeming pedantic. Several decades ago, I read that the term "Adhesive" is generic, and "glue", strictly speaking, is one type of adhesive (probably defined as primarily earlier technology, and probably/typically composed of animal/fish-derived substances). Until I read this article, I have kept that distinction*. It seems that the usage of "adhesive" and "glue" in the article is somewhat inconsistent, but considering that my belief is that of an amateur, I haven't changed any text. Nevertheless, I hope to see a clarification in the lead sentence [s] of the article regarding common usage and (versus?) the exact definition of "glue".

Best regards, Nikevich (talk) 15:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Applications

[edit]

This article (and it is not alone) fails in one of the primary purposes of an encyclopaedic article. A layperson seeking information about adhesives is likely to want help in finding the best choice for a particular task. A section devoted to this would be best, although a poor second would be relevant information under each glue type section. treesmill (talk) 10:10, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edit to Preview and History Section

[edit]

I have recently replaced the preview and history sections with what I consider better written, verifiable ones. Please review and post recommendations. HIST406-13rgrover1 (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

overly general?

[edit]

I feel like this should be a category instead of an article. Attempting to lump all types of adhesives into one article invite excessive simplifications and results in a poor description of any given topic. You wouldn't try and describe every type of vehicle in one single article, because you wouldn't be able to provide an appropriate level of information on any particular vehicle. This is especially apparent in this article, as many of these different types of adhesives have bonding mechanisms with no relation to any other adhesive in the article. It's like trying to explain helicopters and boats in the same article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.42.152.225 (talk) 22:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a survey article to give an overview of the topic, with pointers to more-detailed information in other articles. It is also used to provide comparisons of different adhesives, which cannot be done by a simple category. This article does need improvement in many areas, but the overall format is appropriate. Reify-tech (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One-part vs. 2-part adhesives

[edit]

The section on one-part adhesives has a subsection describing a two-part adhesive that cures when exposed to heat... Doesn't that make it a 2-part adhesive and therefore shouldn't it be in that section? Or am I missing something here? KDS4444Talk 14:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adhesive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'broken' reference

[edit]

I don't know how references are supposed to work, but the link at

  Mittal and Pizzi 2003, p. 3.

is not helpful. On careful examination, it is, itself, a reference to the bibliography section, but it doesn't work: clicking on it does not take you to the bibliography section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.188.143.67 (talk) 01:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Working temperature ranges

[edit]

I have been asked to re-fix a handle which is no longer spot-welded to a bowl (17cm across, 6cm deep, about 0.5mm thick; handle is bent rod, 5mm diameter; both are stainless steel) which is apparently used for boiling but might be put in a refrigerator.

So I need a glue which has a working temperature range encompassing say -20C to 110C. Most glue manufacturers do not, as far as I can see, give that sort of information (but I knew of one type which claims an upper limit of 1300C).

I suggest, therefore, for the Article, a table of properties, giving for each generic type of glue: whether it sets hard or flexible, its setting time at normal temperature, its working temperature range, etc. For some jobs, that table could be enough to show what is needed; for others it could at least eliminate some categories.

I don't know enough to begin writing such a table. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 22:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Chemical weld" glues

[edit]

Perhaps I missed it, but I don't see mention of adhesives that work by partially dissolving the items to be joined so that they fuse then reharden as the solvent(s) evaporate. Examples include plastic model cement, which softens and fuses polystyrene, and the cement used with PVC pipe and fittings. (There is even an enzyme used in modernist cooking that bonds meats this way.) This would be a sub-classification of the drying type glues, but the method of bonding is sufficiently different from others as to warrant its own description.

I know a little about this, but am not sufficiently expert to write such a section well. Someone more knowledgeable that I should, please, add this. Joe Avins (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The redirect Liquid nails has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Liquid nails until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Adhesive&oldid=1219508563"

Categories: 
C-Class vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia vital articles in Technology
C-Class level-4 vital articles
Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Technology
C-Class vital articles in Technology
C-Class Metalworking articles
Low-importance Metalworking articles
C-Class Chemistry articles
Mid-importance Chemistry articles
WikiProject Chemistry articles
C-Class Technology articles
WikiProject Technology articles
C-Class Materials articles
Mid-importance Materials articles
WikiProject Materials articles
Wikipedia articles as assignments
 



This page was last edited on 18 April 2024, at 05:08 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki