This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
I have a question concerning the levels of governance of Montreal. Going from top-to-bottom, first you have Montreal (Region), and then you have the Urban agglomeration of Montreal, which would usually be a lower level (RCM-equivalent), but in this case is also on the same level as a region. Now, this gets tricky. Is the Montreal Metropolitan Community a level below, or is the MMC also on the same level as the urban agglomeration/regional level? From what I'm reading, it sounds like it's a lower level of government, but actually includes municipalities outside the Urban agglomeration boundaries which are actually in other RCM's, which would seem to make it more important the the Urban agglomeration despite technically being a level of government beneath the Urban agglomeration. What is the difference in the composition of the Montreal Metropolitan Community and the Urban agglomeration of Montreal? Also, which services/competencies are unique to each of these bodies? This sounds like an awful lot of govermnental overlap from the municipal to the regional level. You've got the Montreal City Council at the lower level, then you have the Montreal Metropolitan Community with its own government, then you have the Urban agglomeration/regional council above that, but which actually covers a smaller area than the MMC. Perhaps, a diagram showing levels would be useful. --Criticalthinker (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No one can answer this? It's seems that Urban agglomerations shouldn't be listed at the local level, rather, they seem to be RCM territorial equivalents as they are composed of local governments. The MCs should probably be listed, but as a special case in the Supralocal category. UAs should be listed as the primary/most frequent RCM equivalents. --Criticalthinker (talk) 09:42, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Someone has got to answer these questions. This is not made clear in the article. I don't know what level of government the Metropolitan Community is on. --Criticalthinker (talk) 17:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The urban agglomeration is also a member, along with many neighbouring municipalities, of the Communauté métropolitaine de Montréal. It is run by a council composed of elected officials from the agglomeration of Montreal, the agglomeration of Longueuil, the city of Laval, and eight other surrounding municipalities. I will update the page to clear this up. --Cornellier (talk) 18:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's been half a decade since I posted most of those questions, but in the interim, I was able to roughly figure out the answers. Though, I'm still unsure of how the CMM and UA interact, or whether they are just parallel to one another. The best I can describe it is that the UA is a TE (territorial equivalent) and simultaneously a Region, and that the CM would be on the same level of administration. What's still confusing is that it seems the responsibilities for the UA and CM seem to overlap so that the UA is basically takes the place of the CM on the island. It also seems that the UA is unnecessarily, administratively, since the CM predates it. --Criticalthinker (talk) 12:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Administrative divisions of Quebec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
