While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
I belive my change to be of historic importance due to the face that the biggest disaster in NASA history occured during the adminstration of William Graham.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.73.4.173 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 23 March 2007
The list of Acting Administrators is missing names as shown in this source (Dryden, Paine, Low... ). I think acting Administrators should be separated from the main list. Hektor (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Griffin's administrator term expired on January 20, 2009, I've fixed some information relating to this but it should be re-written better when a new person fills the spot.
TheJoak (talk) 21:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How come two modern acting administrators are included but not those older ones attested by NASA? If some are obmitted because they were deputies than that is inconsistent with, say, Frederick D. Gregory being listed in both. Hekerui (talk) 09:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The older acting administrators weren't included by myself because they weren't in the NASA list; see [1]. I assumed that NASA would provide the authoritative list (and that the office was vacant in between administrators), and hence didn't pro-actively search for additional ones; in hindsight that was an error. They've since been added to the list by NASA. [2]. Thanks Myself488(talk·contribs) for adding them to the article. Mike Peel (talk) 14:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
Back in 2008, I merged Administrator of NASA and Deputy Administrator of NASA into this list. Prompted by @I Am Chaos's recent edits, and looking back through this list, I think that was a mistake: it would be better to have separate articles for these roles. They seem to be more separate than I thought, particularly as demonstrated by the current lead that focuses on the Administrator role and ignores the Deputy part. The 'Line of succession' part is a bit odd, though - perhaps it could be duplicated in both articles, or perhaps moved to a separate article? I'm also not sure how this change would interact with the featured list process - would we just get two featured lists, or would they need to be re-approved? Thoughts? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
HiMike Peel (talk·contribs)! I saw your tagging me and was surprised I didn't think this edit would need much discussion, but then I logged in and saw what it was. You may have seen I just went through and cleaned up a few things that I noticed in the top section (which I hadn't been looking for on my first visit to the article).
My incoherent rambling aside, and onto your proposal; It seems that the section on NASA#Leadership is actually longer than the first two sections on this page, not that it needs to be longer. Each list is certainly long enough to have its own page. There is no information on the DA in the #Duties and responsibilities, so that would need to be created regardless. I could get a paragraph in there this week regardless of what this Proposal brings. I would propose that the Line of Succession would be left only in the Administrator article in the case of a split. Albeit interesting (at least to a nerd of procedure like myself), I don't think it is particularly applicable except for the part where deputy acts as administrator, which I would argue falls under #Duties and responsibilities moreso than a separate section. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 02:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]