Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 GA Review  
6 comments  


1.1  Comments  



1.1.1  OL concerns  





1.1.2  "Reasonably well-written"  





1.1.3  Images  









2 Nationality  
1 comment  













Talk:Adrien Agreste




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Adrien Agreste/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DanielleTH (talk · contribs) 20:45, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Will review this shortly. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 20:45, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a(prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a(references):
    b(citations to reliable sources):
    c(OR):
    d(copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a(major aspects):
    b(focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a(images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b(appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Comments

[edit]

Okay, let's get this done!

OL concerns

[edit]

Don't link:

"Reasonably well-written"

[edit]

Images

[edit]

Papenbrook's image is under the correct license. Both images of Adrien have good rationales and are a good size. Captions are great, especially on the one of Cat Noir, more than justifying its placement.

Overall, great job on the article. Awaiting your changes. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 02:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@DanielleTH: Hello and thank you for reviewing the article! I have tried to make all the aforementioned changes. All I would like to add is:

- Yes, Astruc was quoted there; I attributed the sentence to him;

- Instead of "the two main characters" or "the two main leads", I wrote "the two lead characters";

- Yes, Adrien's Miraculous is called the Cat Miraculous, thank you for pointing this out;

- In Marinette's article, the word "superhero" was linked back in the lead after I had removed the links (including this one), so for now I have linked it once again in the infobox, caption, and body of the article; I have also linked the word in Adrien's article in order to maintain a sense of continuity between the two articles; I know that the word "superhero" is widely known by the readers, but maybe it should be kept linked in both articles since it is important to their subjects. Flowerpiep (talk) 18:19, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Flowerpiep[reply]

This is your article, Flowerpiep, and if you'd like it to be linked for consistency and clarity's sake I don't see a problem with it. You can justify it here and to other editors so I personally believe it to be fine. All other changes look great, congrats on the two GAs! DanielleTH (Say hi!) 22:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DanielleTH: Thank you! Flowerpiep (talk) 10:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Flowerpiep[reply]

Nationality

[edit]

I've had to revert multiple IP editors adding the unsourced assertion of Adrien being French-British. If any of these editors can provide a reliable source of this claim, then I am more than willing to insert it into the entry. The Miraculous Ladybug Wiki is not a reliable source since it is user generated. As far as I'm concerned, searches into his nationality provided no reliable sources and no indication of an alternative nationality. KangarooGymnast (talk) 14:45, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Adrien_Agreste&oldid=1204548413"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Media and drama good articles
GA-Class fictional character articles
WikiProject Fictional characters articles
GA-Class Animation articles
Low-importance Animation articles
GA-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
GA-Class Animated television articles
Unknown-importance Animated television articles
Animated television work group articles
GA-Class Computer animation articles
Unknown-importance Computer animation articles
Computer animation work group articles
WikiProject Animation articles
Wikipedia Did you know articles
 



This page was last edited on 7 February 2024, at 09:19 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki