Contents

Talk:Affair of the Poisons

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Affair of the Poisons article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Occult Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Death Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

this article is a fairly good summary of the events but I see that it was written in an older wiki-style before we did in-line citations for facts. I do happen to have a copy of the Somerset books so I can try and provide inline cites with page numbers for some of the asserted facts but not all. I'd also like to see a couple of images of the major players included. Can anyone help me out?LiPollis (talk) 20:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the following is correct: "six women were imprisoned at Château de Villefranche". According to <http://www.fort-liberia.com/fort-liberia/page_4.html> eight women were imprisoned at the Fort Libéria in Villefranche-de-Conflent. Actually, I visited this place and saw the prison. The Château de Villefranche is located somewhere else, namely in the commune of Villeneuve-lès-Bouloc in the Haute-Garonne département of France (see the Wikipedia entry for it). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Microbizz (talk • contribs) 11:02, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reference to "Sex With Kings" was introduced in this diff, by Kazuba. It was recently revised by Moonraker to read "in her book Sex with Kings, records that Given claimed the remains..." instead of "in her book Sex with Kings, records "Given" claimed the remains...". This makes no sense. "Given" is obviously not a name. I checked the book, and it seems that the passage Kazuba refers to reads: "Given reports of babies' bones in La Voisin's garden, the police started digging. They uncovered the remains of twenty-five hundred infants (...)". It made little sense as written originally, but the quote-removing edit by Moonraker really made this less obvious and more confusing, given that "Given", without quotes and capitalized looks like a name, which isn't mentioned anywhere, because it isn't a name. How about checking that stuff makes sense before editing? --Lasse Hillerøe Petersen (talk) 09:49, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is listed as among the prisons where the various accused were incarcerated. However, Google does not know the word "Salces" as a place name - I believe the correct article may be Fort de Salses, but (presumably) this isn't what the reference says. Is there another reference that can confirm the correct location? Tevildo (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]