This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofCalifornia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
For clarity's sake, the MMA arm of the Affliction empire should be moved to its own page. As Affliction's press release here notes, Affliction Clothing, Inc. is a separate entity from and does not control Affliction Entertainment, LLC, which is the promoter of the MMA events.[1]hateless20:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly feel that all the famous athletes or artists should be listed, it would give this page more depth
Can i get conseus vote or i will place it myself
(Punisher88 (talk) 14:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]
The part about Vancouver and Victoria is the first thing that comes to my eyes when I open this link. While it's interesting that a smaller North American city has problems with a particular line of clothing being worn by gang members, it's sort of misleading and possibly defaming. It's like saying that Mercedes Benz or Rolex have gang connections (not saying that Affliction is in anyway a comparable marque brand). I prepose it's rewritten or removed all together.
I am noticing a steady increase in negativity on the web, towards this brand, in correlation with the Vancouver thing. Except it is not gang-related, but usually websites associating Affliction with "douche-behavior". This is of course completely subjective, BUT considering the increasing number of clubs who ban Affliction in their dress code, due to the perceived image the brand has, it might be of interest to include a controversy section, if this trend persists. 2001:7E8:C658:8B01:F4:1F51:509E:23C1 (talk) 13:33, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 4 external links on Affliction Clothing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
