This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
I think this prince is the same as Ahmose-Sipair. Dodson places him earlier in the dynasty. The first son of Ahmose I was Ahmose-ankh, he was the one who predeceased his father, thus allowing Amenhotep I to inherit. – Alenshatalk15:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Therefore,the mummy formerly thought to be Thutmose I [but who is a prince] stands a goodchance of being Ahmose-Sipair" -- Marianne Luban
There are 2 or 3 different Sipair's of similar timeframe. One is the son of Seqenenre_Tao. And a second one who appears to be the son of Ahmose. I think the 5 year old is the elder. The mummy of Thutmose I, who is 30 years old, does not conform to the expected age of Thutmose I(60 years old). I think this 30 year old mummy is that of Ahmose Sipair. A possible third Sipair is listed on a monument as the son of Ahmosi(Sister of Amenhotep I) and Wedehu Senbu(Unknown).
Additionally, Manetho lists an additional pharoah, Khebron, before Amenhotep I. I believe this pharoah is not Thutmose I out of order, but that of a missing additional pharoah, Ahmose Sipair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.57.110.91 (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
From all the evidence it seems that Chebron was Thutmose II and it is out of order. It is clear that none of the Sipairs ever became pharaoh. 79.129.93.148 (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
