| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aileen Cannon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org
|
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In Section
Early life and education
there is a Reference
<ref name=Wilner>
The article in the Reference is archived. But on 2023-02-14 the URL for the original article was still valid.
Into the Cite template, please insert
| url-status=live
71.162.138.11 (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Judges are non-partisan, and in point of fact, no other judge from the Southern District of Florida has a political party appended to their biography. Judge Cannon's biography should have the same designations as the other judges - either all should be called out by the political party of their nominator, or none. This article should be edited to reflect that change. 2601:601:181:7DF0:9493:A65D:BFB2:6CF3 (talk) 17:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with this article as I see it is that news articles about politically contentious current issues are clearly not appropriate encylcopedic references ( if you disagree, find me at least two other encylopedias that allow sourcing claims this way Therfore much of the article is inappeopriately sourced in any event such that the article aa written clearly violates WP:NPOV on the face of it because the media is simply not a enclyclopedically factual source of information due to their clearly undeniable political party affilliations. Therefore, Im in favor of placing the POV dispute tag on this article until we have non-media primary factual sources of high quality to substantiate the claims such that we prevent inappropriate DNC soapboxing on Wikipedia in line with the 501C3 requirement that Wikimedia foundation cant engage in politics without automatically loosing their 501C3 tax exempt staus. 2600:8804:6F12:5800:6045:30E5:ED86:BA99 (talk) 19:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change
The hearing featured five judicial nominees, with Republican senators focused on questioning J. Philip Calabrese and Democratic senators focused on questioning Toby Crouse> Afterward Democratic senators sent Cannon many follow-up questions to answer.[14][21]
to
The hearing featured five judicial nominees, with Republican senators focused on questioning J. Philip Calabrese and Democratic senators focused on questioning Toby Crouse. Afterward Democratic senators sent Cannon many follow-up questions to answer.[14][21]
(Replace > by .) Quantum menace (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Jamedeus (talk) 22:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]Heads up that ref 106 is currently broken 104.232.119.107 (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Many thanks. If the orphan ref "hugo" was meant to be the same as that defined as "lowell" which quickly follows it (Lowell, Hugo; Joseph, Cameron (May 8, 2024). "Judge scraps date for Trump Mar-a-Lago documents trial without rescheduling". The Guardian. Retrieved May 8, 2024.), then I've fixed it. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is a typo for the source for footnote 124. The newspaper "Guardian" is misspelled. Joe (talk) 10:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks, I've corrected that. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]In the paragraph regarding the 11th circuit, reversing her ruling in the Trump case the sentence says she was reversed and admonished. The term admonishment means disciplined within the legal profession. Other judges have been admonished, but that is always by the judicial council of that circuit. There was no disciplinary action taken, regard to judge Cannon us using the word admonishment is legally incorrect. Be more accurate to use different words to describe the reversal without display action. 207.65.52.25 (talk) 05:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone please add an IPA pronunciation guide for her first name? The first syllable rhymes with "ray" not "rye". -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
