Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Sullenberger/CBS YouTube video re side-sticks  
1 comment  




2 propose new title to current subheading of "Side-stick control issue"  
1 comment  




3 Should "THS" be wikified to stabilizer (aeronautics)?  
2 comments  




4 Air France 447 title change  
2 comments  




5 How many NRSA pax were on AF 447?  
2 comments  




6 Air France 447  
2 comments  













Talk:Air France Flight 447




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Sullenberger/CBS YouTube video re side-sticks[edit]

When filming with CBS inside an A320 simulator to show how the side-stick worked, Sullenberger never directly said the normal safeguards for "dual input" had been completely ineffective in a dire cockpit emergency but that's exactly what he and CBS exposed. Therefore he exposed an obvious and deadly "secondary hazard." "Dual input" by itself in a normal cockpit environment is harmless but in chaotic cockpit environment, which is a hazard itself,(primary hazard) it becomes a different hazard (a secondary hazard) which is deadly. Can this fact firstly be exposed on wiki as just attempted...? A5afety (talk) 07:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

propose new title to current subheading of "Side-stick control issue"[edit]

As evident in BEA's own reports and other shown commentary the safeguards against Side-stick misuse were ineffective. They are alarms that were overwhelmed by other alarms. The title could read "Side-stick control- safety alarms ineffective" or similar to entirely reflect the content of this section. This is then consistent with sub heading 7.1 which reads "Inaccurate airspeed indicators" and doesn't simply say "airspeed indication issue"A5afety (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should "THS" be wikified to stabilizer (aeronautics)?[edit]

Apokrif (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

given that the acronym isn't used again in the article, it is redundant, and shouldn't be there. You could Wikilink 'horizontal stabilizer' instead. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Air France 447 title change[edit]

Simplify the title to just simply “high-altitude stall” Wienliebe (talk) 19:04, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the only high altitude stall in history, and even if it were, another one could happen in future. "High-altitude stall" generic, not specific to this flight. Elominius (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How many NRSA pax were on AF 447?[edit]

How many NRSA pax were on AF 447? 173.233.115.235 (talk) 13:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National Research Service Awards? National Rivers and Streams Associations? I had to scroll down twice in my search results to figure out that you meant "Non-Revenue Space-Available" passengers. IAmNitpicking (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Air France 447[edit]

when you approach an area of thunderstorms and before you establish turbulence penetration speed you give the storm a wide berth by altering your heading either right or left to maintain the wide berth away from the storm never climb or descend and continue heading towards the storm in the hope that you will be ok once you are clear of the storm return to your track...an aeroplane can be flown safely without any airspeed indication with the artificial horizon vertical speed indicator altimeter and engine power. 175.38.52.94 (talk) 04:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and of course your pitot tube heat on throughout. 175.38.52.94 (talk) 05:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Air_France_Flight_447&oldid=1222605021"

Categories: 
Wikipedia articles that use British English
B-Class aviation articles
B-Class Aviation accident articles
Aviation accident task force articles
Old requests for aviation peer review
WikiProject Aviation articles
B-Class Brazil articles
Low-importance Brazil articles
B-Class history of Brazil articles
Low-importance history of Brazil articles
History of Brazil task force articles
WikiProject Brazil articles
B-Class Disaster management articles
Mid-importance Disaster management articles
B-Class France articles
Low-importance France articles
All WikiProject France pages
Wikipedia In the news articles
Selected anniversaries (June 2011)
Selected anniversaries (June 2012)
Selected anniversaries (June 2015)
Hidden categories: 
Aviation articles needing attention to referencing and citation
Aviation articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
Selected anniversaries articles
 



This page was last edited on 6 May 2024, at 21:51 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki