Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 2007-09-29 Automated pywikipediabot message  
1 comment  




2 intuitive description of strength to weight ratio wanted  
1 comment  




3 Re: Dope-on-tissue model aircraft construction  
3 comments  




4 White?  
1 comment  




5 External links modified  
2 comments  













Talk:Aircraft dope




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


2007-09-29 Automated pywikipediabot message[edit]

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

intuitive description of strength to weight ratio wanted[edit]

Usually fabric has a good strength to weight ratio and stiffness if it has long straight fibers in tight contact with other fibers (woven) pointing in the same direction. From the short description it seems as if fibers would slip into each other much like in a muscle if the dope is applied. May be we can compare it to heat shrinking of polyester. For most sails or for spokes in wheels and buildings the tension is actively applied. Dope is only used if this is not possible. -- Arnero (talk) 15:16, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dope-on-tissue model aircraft construction[edit]

First off, let me apologize if my reason for removing the "citation needed" tag from the line concerning model aircraft was inadequate. However, having some knowledge of model aircraft construction, I must stand by my opinion. Dope is routinely applied over tissue, and attempting to find a reference stating as much would likely be as hard as finding a reference stating that the sky is up. I could of course cite such things as magazine articles and build logs that mention using dope over tissue, but I doubt that those would meet the standards of a Wikipedia-worthy reference either (If they do, please mention it and I will gladly provide some). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.134.101 (talk) 03:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. As per WP:V every bit of substantial text that makes claims needs to cite a reference, no matter how obvious to some people. If this is really very common knowledge then it should be easy to find references. - Ahunt (talk) 11:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All of the above is of course true 8) so I've added a line on modelling use with a reference p.r.newman (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

White?[edit]

I removed this as it is unreferenced, and in my view plain wrong. I have been around aircraft for a long time and have only come across two colours for dope - Clear and Silver. These are used to taughten the fabric and over painted to give colours. They are rarely used with added pigment as it usually degrades the performance of the dope.

White is most common to reflect damaging sunlight, but any colour can be supplied and existing colors can usually be matched by manufacturers.[citation needed]  


--Petebutt (talk) 04:59, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Aircraft dope. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checked - Ahunt (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Aircraft_dope&oldid=1198208051"

Categories: 
C-Class aviation articles
C-Class aircraft articles
WikiProject Aircraft articles
WikiProject Aviation articles
Transwikied to Wiktionary
Hidden categories: 
Aviation articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
Aviation articles needing attention to grammar
 



This page was last edited on 23 January 2024, at 12:01 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki