Contents

Talk:Ajmer

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles India: Cities / Rajasthan Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Top-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

This link:

• Ajmer entry in Encyclopaedia Iranica

Was added by a Columbia University IP along with many other links to the site. I have moved it hear in keeping with our external links guidelines so unconnected editors can evaluate its appropriateness. Many of the websites entries are short and may not contain much more than the articles they have been added to. However, this might be a good source even if editors do not consider it an appropriate external link. -- SiobhanHansa 23:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia Iranica is produced by Columbia University and is a scholarly source. It should not be removed from the articles as they are pertinent sources of reference.--Zereshk 12:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please inform me who train will go in ajmer

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 06:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text says "Pushkar is famous for Pushkar Lake and the 14th century Hindu temple to Brahma, God as the Creator of all creation. This is the only temple of Brahma in the world."

However, another article says "Others include one in Thirunavaya in Kerala; one in the temple town of Kumbakonam, (Thanjavur District) in Tamil Nadu; one in Asotra village in Balotra Taluka of Barmer district in Rajasthan known as Kheteshwar Brahmadham Tirtha; one in Brahma-Karmali village in Sattari Taluka in Goa, one in Khedbrahma in Gujarat and one in the village of Khokhan in the Kullu Valley, 4 km from Bhuntar. Regular pujas are held for Lord Brahma at the temple in Thirunavaya and during Navrathris, this temple comes to life with colourful festivities."67.169.27.90 (talk) 04:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The point is well-taken. I shall make the emendation in the article. Thanks.Kanchanamala (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=npaJTf3XI4LTrQf8_9XNDg&ct=result&id=mqYIAAAAQAAJ&dq=ahirs+of+ajmer&q=52

The Rajputana gazetteers-page -34

	An image used in this article, File:Anasagar view from baradari.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:19, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	An image used in this article, File:Colours of Pushkar fair.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:32, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

this article is about ajmer city, so why the image of pushkar lake is representing it in it's infobox? Is pushkar comes in city limits of ajmer? i am suggesting to remove image. feel free to respond.Johnofjln (talk) 01:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Image removed. Skinsmoke (talk) 09:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Johnofjln & Skinsmoke: Even as the Statue of Liberty is included in New York City, so has Pushkar been included in Ajmer for centuries. Please consider restoring the image of Pushkar Lake. Kanchanamala (talk) 03:08, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Much of this article covers places outside the city, and needs to be removed or transferred to the Ajmer district article. Skinsmoke (talk) 09:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User Tovojolo has gone to great lengths to abridge the article. Why? May I request other editors to look into this? Kanchanamala (talk) 03:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you bothered to look at what existed before? The question needs to be asked: Why didn't somebody else edit it? It was horrible, written in appalling and execrable English. At least, now there is an article that can actually be read.

--Tovojolo (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Can we go back to the unabridged version and make it readable? Kanchanamala (talk) 03:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been made readable. Long articles are not good just because they're long. It was full of gibberish. What we have now is far better, interesting and valid. --Tovojolo (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. May I urge other editors also to weigh in on this. Kanchanamala (talk) 22:43, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's now 7 July 2012, nearly 6 weeks since you first complained about "abridgement" as you called it. It is noteworthy that not one "other editor" has "weighed in on this". I think you just have to accept that everyone is happy with the article as it now is - free of gibberish.

Tovojolo (talk) 21:56, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely right Tovojolo, not one other editor has weighed in on this. I have a suggestion for you. The article on London, UK, is also full of "gibberish". Would you please abridge it? Kanchanamala (talk) 03:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ajmer was ruled by Chechi Gujars Ajayrajposwal (talk) 03:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ajmer have to named as city of great king prithviraj chauhan Krishnagangadhar (talk) 08:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]