This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:27, June 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Page moved to Akatsuki (probe). Vegaswikian (talk) 20:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would oppose the move as proposed to "Akatsuki probe", but agree that moving to "Akatsuki (probe) seems most logical. --DAJF (talk) 23:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Just a note really not to assume this should all be converted to past tense yet. As detailed here it may be possible to try for another insertion in 7 years time and the indications from this press conference were that they intended to try. ChiZeroOne (talk) 05:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
General point this article is out of date bits of its are in the wrong tense and probably needs a major rewrite — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.219.152.247 (talk) 17:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. Read it completely and then fix what you think needs fixing. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 02:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
JAXA says "The OME [is] a newly developed ceramic thruster made of silicon nitride (Si3N4.) It is the first time in the world to successfully generate the thrust by the ceramic thruster in space." Worth including or not? 67.141.98.142 (talk) 01:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it burned down and left the probe adrift for 5 years. I would not call it "successful". BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For the (heliocentric) orbit control they did produce thrust. Were there unsuccessful operations before? Otherwise we could just say "it is the first time they were used". --mfb (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
