This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
To michaelm: As I said before, it's not necessary to have *both* the soc-dem and dem-soc links in the introducation, given that the terms are more-or-less interchangeable in the Canadian context. (Note also: there *is* a dem-soc wikilink further down the page.) CJCurrie 17:01, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
As it is, the page is almost unreadable. It took me a while to figure out what this group's philosophy was. I think a lot of the issues of the page could be addressed with some decisive edits. Rajvansh Upadhyay (talk) 20:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You appear to be a new editor. No problem, but please make sure you familiarise yourself with WP:5P before you kick off a major rewrite. In particular, WP:CITE and WP:RS, along with WP:NPOV, are going to be absolutely critical to your success. These are tricky policies, even for well-established editors. You are, of course, welcome to make changes. If you find yourself getting reverted, please stop, take a step back, and come here to establish consensus for your changes. You might not be able to do that, in which case you should refrain from reintroducing your content. Editing Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. I hope your earlier comment here no longer reflects your approach to editing. --Yamla (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article has had a "multiple issues" notice, referencing both "tone" and "more citations needed" problems, since 2016. I question whether these issues still apply to the article in its current state. Comments? — Richwales(no relation to Jimbo) 04:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Alberta NDP labeled more left wing then BC NDP?[edit]
BCNDP is labelled as center-left but ANDP is labelled as center-left to left, but in reality BCNDP is much further to the right of Alberta NDP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymousioss (talk • contribs) 18:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
