Allied logistics in the Southern France campaign is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The preference for the Notes/References format works excellently here, considering the proliferate number of textual sources.
The article reads extremely cohesively, though perhaps to the article's detriment. While read in full the article functions effectively, certain things like dates could do with being repeated in additional sections to improve at-a-glance legibility. Definitely not something that would detract from this article to the degree to deny the article GA status under WP:GACR.
Avoidance of plagiarism is evident. Very good job on that.
Update: life has happened. Will try to perform more reviewing this weekend but we are perhaps two weeks out from completion. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:20, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But the French Army recruited in North Africa was made up of personnel from the French colonial empire, many of whom came from less industrially developed parts of the world. This made finding the requisite skilled personnel for service units challenging. I'm going to delete the "but" and restructure the succeeding sentence
Every fifth citation plus a couple extra as I felt like it.
1 : Y
2 : Y Phrasing perhaps too similar but publishing by U.S. government makes it acceptable from a copyright perspective.
4 : Y I can't make heads or tails of how to use this government database. I would almost recommend directly linking every page in the citation rather than a single citation through which all pages must be found. Not counting this against the review.
Just a minor update: completion can be expected before 20 May, but any earlier than that is unlikely due to academic and familial considerations. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While the the lede reads somewhat overly vague at times, it succeeds in providing a generalized summary that is supported by the sourced information found within the article. Otherwise, he writing is tight and no typos or grammatical errors are evident.
While the article might be construed as dry, one can only expect so much flair from such a topic lest it violate NPOV standards. Several instances find the article entering into specifics, but generally the deployments of unsummarized information and statistics are executed to demonstrate scale and unique characteristics.
First, I would like to thank Hawkeye7 for their patience throughout the process. Second, I must commend them for the completion of an excellent article absolutely worthy for elevation to Good Article status. This article was clearly written and was very useful for someone still learning the ropes of GA. As I am new to the process, if I fail to properly admit the article to GA status, I would like the support of other editors. Thanks! ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just a query on title - should these be called American rather than allied logistics? Other allied ie French or British isn't even mentioned in the article. Eastfarthingan (talk) 19:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Im curious on why the word dearth is used in this article as its a very uncommon word, especially on wikipedia, and may cause confusion to readers or may be seen as a typo of "Death" by passing editors. PerryPerryDTalk To Me17:55, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Y
Done
Y I can't make heads or tails of how to use this government database. I would almost recommend directly linking every page in the citation rather than a single citation through which all pages must be found. Not counting this against the review.
b(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
