| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alsos Mission article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Alsos Mission is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Alsos Mission is part of the History of the Manhattan Project series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 30, 2015. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
The interrogation of German prisoners indicated that uranium and thorium were being processed in It was discovered that most of the output was sent to the Auergesellschaft
This first sentence seems to be broken. Someone shoudl fix it. StoneProphet (talk) 21:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Groves memoir 'Now it can be Told' is not a reliable source and is heavily biased against the European scientists and in particular the French, so the comment that Joliot was not fully behind the Allied mission is an aspersion cast by Groves and not in any way factual and should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.83.95 (talk) 01:15, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Illusory: Based on illusion; not real. The fall of Rome was real just delayed until 4 June 1944; it was therefore elusive. No edit waring please!128.170.224.12 (talk) 22:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations to all the contributors to this featured article. You deserve a lot of applause, recognition and appreciation. What a wonderful article.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alsos Mission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alsos Mission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Hawkeye7, when I added the link I kept the title of the article ("Walter Bedell Smith") because he was usually known by the name 'Bedell Smith', but no big deal. I'll redo the link but keep his name as you have it. Tomseattle (talk) 11:28, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
