This page was proposed for deletionbyBoleyn (talk·contribs) on 29 August 2008 with the comment: I don't think the case has been made for this company's notability. It reads, to me, like an advert for an ordinary business. It has mainly been edited by two users who have only (or at least mostly) edited articls on Alten8, one of whom clearly works for the company as his user name is the sam as one of the 'key people' listed in the article. It was contestedbyRMHED (talk·contribs) on 2008-09-02 with the comment: Deserves an AfD
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
what is different about this page about a games company to all the other pages about games companies? we do not understand why this one has been singled out and say not 'atari' for example, this company holds the biggest non giant corporation, retro game license banks, and is bring those out on new formats? so what is the difference?
(Andrewsuk13:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]
This article was nominated for speedy deletion as spam. I have removed this nomination as I have judged it not to be spam but an article about a company with some claims to notability. References should be added so as to confirm its notability and this Google News Archive contains some sources. [1]. Capitalistroadster04:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have added in a few external links to verify some of the content. A lot of the page links to internal Wikipedia pages, so I have added in a few external links.
Any help in building the page would be useful, as my knowledge of Wiki editing is limited at this stage. I've edited a few other pages but only simple little edits.
I have just modified 3 external links on Alten8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
