This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the NorthGermanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
But there is no (established) English word for folketing - 'folkthing' would be natural, but the OED does not list it. Althing has existed since the late nineteenth century (and isn't it closer to the Old Norse?).
Someone please check my work. There was a reference to "this same royal decree" but no prior reference to a decree. I puzzled over the Icelandic Alþingi article and I think I got it right. It's been 20 years since I studied the language. -- Alarob22:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Them's mighty big words, especially compared to the established claim later in the article that the Althing is the oldest Parliament in Europe. The Manx Tynwald has a documented claim to have been in continuous action since 979. Does anyone have a source? - mholland18:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"The Althing was disbanded by royal decree in 1800" (this article); "The modern parliament, called『Alþingi』(English: Althing), was founded in 1845 as an advisory body to the Danish king." (from Iceland). From what I understand, the current body is an establishment in the spirit of the original (and making a claim of authority based on that tradition), but in no real sense directly connected. Isn't it a bit of a POV stretch to say that it's the oldest still-acting Parliament in the world? - mholland22:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No POV pushing at all. Althing has always been a parliament and is generally regarded as the oldest one in the world, despite the few decades when it was discontinued. Few sources in English:
It has not existed continuously; and most of the time under the Danes it was an appointed High Court of Justice. But its claim to be the oldest is both traditional and defensible. SeptentrionalisPMAnderson21:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting that "Althing" isn't necessarily the only English rendition. Iceland's embassy in the U.S. uses Althingi on its English-language FAQ. The U.S. State Department's background notes on Iceland also uses Althingi, as does the National Geographic Society, though the CIA World Factbook uses Althing. — OtherDave
But Althing is by far the most common, and more common in English than Alþing; we should be accessible to our readers. As to the general question of Icelandic names, I think a doctrinaire adherence to thorn to be both unwise and unhelpful; but they are a far more difficult question than this established name. I have therefore returned this article to the name it bore until it was unwarrantedly moved last March, but I will go no further. SeptentrionalisPMAnderson21:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Under Alþingi, Icelandic Online Dictionary has "Althing (the Icelandic legislative assembly)". To change the topic slightly, I'm curious about the statement that alþing was the Old Norse form. Fritzner's Old Norse dictionary only has alþingi, and Cleasby / Vigfússon calls alþing a "mod(ern) form" of alþingi and doesn't even give alþing a separate entry of its own. I don't remember ever seeing alþing in Old Norse, however most of my reading experience has been with texts that use normalised Old Norse orthography, and in some cases modernised orthography. A search of the Orðabók Háskólans text database produces just one example of alþing in a medieval text, namely Bjarnar saga Hítdælakappa, albeit in modernised spelling, as against 25 examplesofalþing in Modern Icelandic. It offers many examples, however, of alþingi in Old Norse texts. (But note that most, though not all, of these examples are ambiguous, since alþing is identical to alþingi in oblique cases.) These texts too use modern spelling, and may have been assimilated to the modern language on minor points such as slight variants in word form. The O.H. "Database of the Written Language" contains examples of each variant from Modern Icelandic; and the texts in this database are recorded in the original spelling. Provisional conclusion: both alþing and alþingi have been used in post-medieval Icelandic, and alþingi seems to have been the norm in Old Norse too. Whether alþing was used in the medieval language as well, and, if so, to what extent and from how early, I'm not sure. Dependent Variable15:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Alþingi" is the accusative case. The nominative is『alþing.』Foreign words are normally Anglicized from the nominative, not from other cases. 69.196.154.168 (talk) 10:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's impossible because both Alþingi and Alþing are neuter nouns, which never distinguish between nominative and accuative forms in Icelandic (or, indeed, Indo-European languages in general). See Wiktionary. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 21:48, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
hwo is the Leader of the Opposition at alþingi and can you make a list of them ?
There is no such formal or even informal position and no form of address. Steingrímur J. Sigfússon is currently the head of the largest opposition party but I've never heard him referred to as "leader of the opposition". Haukur10:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible that the Allthing in Dan Simmons Hyperion novels is a reference to this topic? It is basically a parliment consisting of the entire internet (or what the internet has evolved into by the time the novel takes place). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.203.6.145 (talk) 06:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In Pico Iyer's book Falling off the Map, he writes, "[...] Marshall Brement, who has written beautifully of how Icelanders were the great European poets of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries and how, even now, on one night a year, every member of Parliament must speak in rhyme."
I've been trying to find further evidence of this idea, but am not having any success. I've tried searching for the 3 books of poetry that Marshall Brement translated, and a few sets of keywords in google, and am not sure what to try next. Can anyone here provide pointers/RSs for corroboration? Or if it's a myth/mistruth then any background information on that? Thanks. –Quiddity (talk) 22:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You can't say it's "literally" translated as "all"-"thing" because those words are both used here in senses that are extinct in Modern English. And it's not appropriate to give a translation into Old English in a Modern English encyclopedia. What for? Work a reference to thing (assembly) into the lede perhaps, but otherwise, skip it. The "literal translation" would be "general assembly", but that's not significantly different from the definition given, "national parliament". Wegesrand (talk) 11:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose. Media sources will drop unusual characters for the convenience of copy editors working on deadline. But that should not be true of reference works. Oxford Reference has one entry for Althingi, one for Alþingi, and 32 for Althing. The most authoritative of the books listed, Oxford Dictionary of English and New Oxford American Dictionary, both use Althing. Whiff of greatness (talk) 04:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have just modified one external link on Althing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Infobox color legend for "Centre Party" does not match "Current Structure of the Iceland Parliament" image that it is describing (see web address below for source image). The correct color in the image is a shade of teal on 9 seats, close to the right side.
wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Althing_2019.svg
I tried to change this myself (it's currently a dark blue), but it's some kind of metadata I don't know how to edit. Here's the spot:
As you can see, the box color is currently dark blue, not teal. I don't know how to change the "Centre Party (Iceland)/meta/color" CaedMcG (talk) 17:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've just rolled back the change that User:JackWilfred made to Template:Centre Party (Iceland)/meta/color (which is the template you couldn't find, CaedMcG). I assume that Jack changed it because the dark blue is the colour the party uses — either we had it wrong or the party changed their branding — but if we're changing the colour for a party, it needs to happen across all wikis that use graphics including that colour. — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk; please {{ping}} me in replies)20:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
In all my research looking into this I have not seen anyone cite a single source for where the date of foundation of the Althingi (930 CE) comes from. I see a lot of “it’s generally accepted” or “it is said to have been” without any evidence to show where that number came from. I don’t want to burst any bubbles, but it seems there’s a lot of things claimed about the early history of this assembly that is simply accepted in good faith without any further investigation. Can anyone speak further on this or direct me to the original source that this 930 date came from? I would love to add a proper citation to this article as the two sources currently cited are not at all adequate or authoritative. Both articles simply make the claim of the 930 founding date and don’t speak any further on the subject. Can we please cite this properly? Sirjohnnysmall (talk) 17:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Book of Icelanders includes a chronology which historians rely on to work out various dates of events. I possess an edition which shows in the prologue how the 930 date is derived and I suspect that most decent editions contain such information in their prologues. Stefán Örvar Sigmundsson (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
