Contents

Talk:Amban

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Qing#Bureaucracy|official titles]] The anchor (#Bureaucracy) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

List of Ambasa in Tibet

Is this list really necessary? I can find the "correct" spellings of the names, little by little, but I don't like the way the whole text is dominated by a list. Shall we delete it or move it to a box or something? --Niohe 13:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From the map in the Qing Dynasty article, it's clear that these territories were considered part of the Qing Dynasty, not merely accepted Qing's suzerainty (and yes, the meanings of suzerainty and sovereignty are different). Either the relevant wording in this article or the map of the Qing Dynasty should be changed. But if you don't like the word "sovereignty", then let's change it to "authority" instead.--207.112.71.179 (talk) 06:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that the categories of "sovereignty" and "suzerainty" are very relevant to Qing China. I would suggest finding another wording ... "authority" might be the right choice.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 18:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amban. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322030513/http://onlinehistories.ssrc.org/centralasia/glossary/default.aspxtohttp://onlinehistories.ssrc.org/centralasia/glossary/default.aspx
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://iea.cass.cn/jianbao/F000252.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]