Contents

Talk:America's Favorite Architecture

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clarification, please

[edit]

"The top 150, released as "America's Favorite Architecture," are listed below:"

The top 150 in what way? How are they ranked? By the number of those surveyed who recognized them? By how many people said they were important? Someone please provide some more specific information about how these rankings came about. 76.252.65.151 (talk) 01:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason that pictures haven't been added for numbers 114-150, or is it just no one has gotten around to it? If no one objects, I'll add pictures for as many as I can in a couple days. faithless (^speak) 00:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

if we should start filling in the "Structures ranked below the top 150" - adding at least architects and dates to them? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No harm, but most have their own articles, though the majority are not linked, and perhaps merely linking them would be enough. Jim.henderson (talk) 19:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on America's Favorite Architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110510113118/http://favoritearchitecture.org/afa150.phptohttp://favoritearchitecture.org/afa150.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider incorporating material from the above draft submission into this article. Drafts are eligible for deletion after 6 months of inactivity. ~Kvng (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]