Contents

Talk:American Jewish World Service

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Judaism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Hello. Ajws (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This may well be a notable organization, but it was originally created by a COI editor with a spamusername. I am extremely reluctant to simply delete it. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, the changes User:Zaharous made are on the whole pretty bad: loss of names of cites, incoherent sentences, etc. I'm tempted to revert to my last version, but don't want to do so without discussing it with other editors first. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I want to thank Zaharous, Leah Kaplan and others for the work they've been putting into this. We've lost some wikilinking, and at some point the whole concept of formatting cites properly per WP:CITE, rather than as mere URLs, seems to have gotten lost. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]