Contents

Talk:Amitabha Buddhist Centre

	Amitabha Buddhist Centre was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 9, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 17, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that a four-year-old boy lama visiting Singapore's Amitabha Buddhist Centre caused a stir when over 10,000 people from all walks of life, including some Christians and Hindus, sought blessings from him?

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Singapore Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Responding to the Wikipedia Community portal, I came to this page and copyedited it for good English, and tried to fix up some of the references into better style. I hope you'll agree it's better now than it was. My only problem left with the page is the references to publications without any publication information, and I was unable to obtain this information. I suspect some of these titles are some of their self-published material, which makes it a poor reference, really, in my opinion. Suggestions for improvement would be to find citations that are not self-published wherever possible, and of course to improve the standard of all the citations. The Wikipedia Reference Generator is invaluable in this. Good luck! Clippership (talk) 22:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrt the mentioned references, only 2 references were used that were based on the centre's in-house publications as some of these activities were not covered in the main stream media or by independent sources during my earlier research. I welcome u or anyone who cld replace them with relevent citations if they cld be found in the near future. Thank u for your excellent copyedits in improving the article further for the benefit of Wikipedia & its readers esp those keen in the development of Tibetan Buddhism in Singapore. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]