Contents

Talk:Animal Charity Evaluators

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Effective Altruism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Animal rights Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 27 April 2021, see discussion. delete, January 30 2016, see discussion.

Based on the currently cited references, I think that this subject falls short of meeting WP:ORGCRITE. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Below is a list of multiple sources which meet the primary criteria in WP:ORGCRITE. These should help to establish that this article meets notability standards. (Note that I have a WP:COI with ACE, so I'll limit my edits to the talk page.) Each of these sources is independent, reliable, & secondary. They have varying levels of coverage, but all have at least substantial coverage.

• Articles that thoroughly cover ACE:
  • What if the most good you can do is to help animals?
  • Want to help animals? Here’s where to donate your money.
  • Where will your donations do the most for animals?

• Articles that significantly cover ACE in a portion of the text:
  • Helping Farmed Animals: High-Impact Rescue
  • Want to help animals? Don’t forget the chickens
  • Save the Chicken
  • Revolution On The Animal Farm

• Books that (I believe) significantly cover ACE in a portion of the text (I haven't read all of these, and the preview only allowed me to see a small number of pages to verify the full extent of coverage):
  • Culture and Activism: Animal Rights in France and the United States
  • Doing Good Better
  • How to Create a Vegan World
  • The End of Animal Farming
  • How To Be Great At Doing Good
  • Critical Terms for Animal Studies
  • Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism

Note that I omitted several books and articles written by people involved with ACE, several primary source materials like academic papers and direct interviews, and a plethora of articles that merely mention ACE briefly. Sifting through these took much more time than doing the actual searches on news.google.com / books.google.com; I'm certain that if others wanted to look for additional sources that meet the WP:ORGCRITE criteria, it wouldn't be too extraordinarily difficult to do. — Eric Herboso 04:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Herboso, I'm not sure about the reliability/independence of a couple of those sources, but there's enough coverage between the sources I recognize to address my concerns. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]