This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
A fact from Aphaena submaculata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Aphaena submaculata(pictured) uses specialized mouthparts to suck the sap of trees?
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Traits and evolution of wing venation pattern in paraneopteran insects - a very brief mention regarding vein patterns, I elected not to add this since it would be way to technical/not concise
'From Volume 21'- this is just a repeat of the Fauna of Nepal source, the latter is more direct
'Nomenclatural changes in the suborders Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera) and Paleorrhyncha (Palaeohemiptera)' -unable to find a non-pay walled version
'Catalogo das especies americanas de Laternariidae:(Homoptera; Fulgoroidea)' - unable to find any mention of the species, this just seems to be a basic list of nomenclature histories, and an outdated one at that.
Very well prepared article. Had little to complain about and would like to see this article promoted to GA soon. WolverineXI(talk to me) 09:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wolverine XI:, that should be everything. Thanks for the review. 🏵️Etrius (Us) 22:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk pageorWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQs are done. All set. Thriley (talk) 10:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done
Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQs are done. All set. Thriley (talk) 10:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
